Chris-
Yes, I was thinking of the Wikimedia Foundation's
projects. Would
Wise-Nano or Nanopedia (the hoped-for end product) be a good addition to
that group of projects?
If my site uses a Creative Commons Attribution-Share
Alike license, does
that fulfill the Gnu license, or do I have to include Gnu boilerplate on
any text I copy from a Gnu'd site?
1) The appropriate list to discuss whether a particular project can be
part of the Wikimedia set of projects is
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I've therefore CC'd my response there.
2) Generally, Wikimedia projects are very broad. There is only one notable
exception to that rule, the recently created Wikispecies (which is why I
think it should be incorporated into a larger Wikidata project).
It has been proposed in the past to have a "Wikipolicy" project as a sort
of open brainstorming space for determining useful political policies on
various issues. That might be an idea worth developing further, but I
would oppose a narrow project like Wise-Nano.
3) All text-centric projects are under the GNU FDL (Wikispecies licensing
is not decided yet), so that would have to be the license to use.
Regards,
Erik