Great now if only that where true. With the vote being 8:4 and my understanding of the situation I am fairly certain it is not. The editors with a medical background on the committee did not support the ban of Will. As this controversy surrounded medical content their positions should be given greater weight.
James, perhaps a more appropriate place to have this conversation is either at the English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee noticeboard, or alternately if you want a different audience, the Wiki-en-L mailing list. Your issue is project-specific and there are more appropriate venues for you to raise your concerns than a WMF-wide mailing list intended to deal with cross-project or all-project issues. An individual editor being banned on one specific project does not meet that threshold.
Risker
On 11 March 2012 12:49, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Great now if only that where true. With the vote being 8:4 and my understanding of the situation I am fairly certain it is not. The editors with a medical background on the committee did not support the ban of Will. As this controversy surrounded medical content their positions should be given greater weight.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org