Durova writes:

Regardless of the merits of the Carolyn Doran story, I'm quite concerned. An interview gives the Register the appearance of respectability.

As I have said, we seriously discussed whether to talk to the Register at all. In general, my belief is that we shouldn't, and my general view hasn't changed. In this particular case, however, there were countervailing concerns that we also had to take seriously. We made the decision that, on balance, it was better in this one particular case to give a very limited interview to the Register.

As is the case with all judgment calls, reasonable people may disagree about what the right decision in this case was. I doubt, however, that it is even theoretically within my power, or anyone's, to give the Register "the appearance of respectability."

I don't think it helps volunteer morale for the Foundation counsel to give interviews to the Register, especially at this time, and particularly when it surprises us like this.

I want to be clear that our discussions reflected, among other things, concern about volunteer morale. I take that issue very seriously, as we all do. Nevertheless, I think that, on balance, we made the best decision we could with the (short) time and (little) advance notice that we had.

--Mike