Hoi, For some of the newly created wikipedias there are reasons why I would not create them as languages in WiktionaryZ in this manner They are:

http://roa-tara.wikipedia.org/ Tarantino http://cbk-zam.wikipedia.org/ Zamboanga Chavacano http://zh-classical.wikipedia.org/ Classical Chinese http://cu.wikipedia.org/ Old Church Slavonic http://ru-sib.wikipedia.org/ Siberian/Nort Russian

- Tarantino is supposed to use the roa code. This code does not signify anything but that it is a Romance language. The code does specify what is included in the code and Tarantino is not one of them. - In ISO-639-3 cbk is the code for Chavacano. Zamboangueño is an alternative name.. - For Classical Chinese there is no specificity as what is meant by this. This is also easy to explain as the zh (zho) code itself is depreciated in the ISO-639-3 because there are some 10 languages that are included in this code. - I might include the Old Church Slavonic as chu. It is used as liturgical language of various Orthodox and Byzantine Catholic churches. It is considered extinct. - The ru-sib is a created language. It is a bad idea to create a code as if it is a dialect of the Russian language when it is not.

Thanks, GerardM