Ridicule? No. I am simply disappointed that you can even make such a
statement. It shows me that we have very radically different ideas about what an
encyclopedia is. Providing correct information is not something I am willing to
compromise. I had hoped that this sentiment was shared by all of Wikipedia's
editors and contributors.
Danny
In a message dated 12/3/2005 10:46:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,
gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com writes:
Hoi,
Why, you ridicule what I have said and I give a deserving answer. You
replied to a lengthy reply, I gave plenty of arguments. And this is all
you take out of it? You do not go into the arguments that were given.
From my perspective in your previous post you had
nothing to say.
Thanks,
GerardM
daniwo59(a)aol.com wrote:
If that is the attitude, then I really have nothing more to say here.
Danny
In a message dated 12/3/2005 10:34:43 AM Eastern Standard Time,
gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com writes:
Hoi,
Yes it is. Other sources can be wrong as well and as I mentioned before
you would kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.
Thanks,
GerardM
daniwo59(a)aol.com wrote:
>
> Is it too much to ask that contributions to Wikipedia be correct? That
is
> news to me.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-