Sometimes it's interesting to read policy from other wikis that are currently successful and growing and see how they differ from WP.
eg: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ThereIsNoSuchThingAsNotability or: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WikipediaUpdater (considered an antipattern on tv tropes!)
Addiction warning: These are links to TVTropes. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TVTropesWillRuinYourLife
(Isn't getting people addicted to reading and editing a *GOOD* thing, from a wiki POV?)
sincerely, Kim Bruning
On 16 November 2011 18:35, Kim Bruning kim@bruning.xs4all.nl wrote:
Sometimes it's interesting to read policy from other wikis that are currently successful and growing and see how they differ from WP.
eg: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ThereIsNoSuchThingAsNotability
Which is a lie. They just changed the words a bit. Deletionist vs inclusionists turns into lumper vs splitter.
Hoi, The term lumper and splitter are used for ages in the world of nomenclature. Really it is more expressive and less officious. Thanks, Gerard
On 17 November 2011 01:03, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 November 2011 18:35, Kim Bruning kim@bruning.xs4all.nl wrote:
Sometimes it's interesting to read policy from other wikis that are
currently successful and growing and see how they differ from WP.
eg:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ThereIsNoSuchThingAsNotability
Which is a lie. They just changed the words a bit. Deletionist vs inclusionists turns into lumper vs splitter.
-- geni
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org