It seems the two of you are barking up the same tree. Nowhere does Klaus say that the version history is invalid, quite on the contrary. He is saying that it _is_ the version history, and therefore that one is not allowed to copy Wikipedia material without republishing the history page as well.
-- Andre Engels, andreengels@gmail.com
Hey. It's a rare event in this list that a responding list member has understood what was the meaning of a message ... Many thanks (and sorry for my bad English which might have supported the misunderstanding).
Klaus Graf
On 05/12/2007, Klaus Graf klausgraf@googlemail.com wrote:
It seems the two of you are barking up the same tree. Nowhere does Klaus say that the version history is invalid, quite on the contrary. He is saying that it _is_ the version history, and therefore that one is not allowed to copy Wikipedia material without republishing the history page as well.
-- Andre Engels, andreengels@gmail.com
Hey. It's a rare event in this list that a responding list member has understood what was the meaning of a message ... Many thanks (and sorry for my bad English which might have supported the misunderstanding).
The meaning was pretty clear. The bit I still don't understand is who you are claiming has said otherwise.
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org