Do you mind providing links to the discussions that took place? That can
help us understand the arguments a bit more, even though I do not think this
is controversial.
Titoxd.
-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Nix
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 4:59 PM
To: foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Foundation-l] Restriction on page moves
inpt.wikipedia.org
Thank you for the answers.
Well, the decision was taken after almost three months of discutions,
followed by a regular voting poll (the same used to choose official
policies).
The option that requires a 45-day-old account to move page was clearly the
will of majority.
If the decision is way to restrictive according to the Foundation,
we'll have to choose the best option available.
Well, that's it. Thank you in advance
Dantadd
************************************************************
In my opinion, but of course i can not speak in any way for the foundation,
this is not an issue that is up to the foundation. The local community knows
best what they need, and I guess that if they find a developer that wants to
implement this, they can just ask him (her) to do it. I see no need to
discuss it all over here :-) It would perhaps be something different if you
prohibit editing for unregistered users etc maybe :-)
Lodewijk
2007/2/18, Titoxd op Wikimedia <titoxd.wikimedia op gmail.com>:
No, it only requires some alterations of the site configuration file.
Nothing major, actually. The main issue here is if it is acceptable to the
Foundation.
Titoxd.
-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces op
lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces op
lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Casey
Brown
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 2:58 PM
To: 'Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Restriction on page moves
inpt.wikipedia.orgThankyou
Hi Daniel, one question: Was this conclusion reached from a "straw poll"
or
discussion? Otherwise, it seems good, but it would probably involve a
site-wide semi-protection against moves and upping the "new account
cut-off"
to 45-days.
-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces op
lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces op
lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
Nix
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 4:25 PM
To: foundation-l op
lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Foundation-l] Restriction on page moves in
pt.wikipedia.orgThankyou
Hi everybody,
In a recent poll on pt.wikipedia it was decided to restrict move
pages to users with at least a 45-day-old registered account, the same
minimum period to grant right to vote (but without the request of 100
valid
editions).
I made a request on
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9024 and
it was suggested to consult the Foundation because the decision seems to
be
very restrictive.
Well, the community decision was:
First question (pro or con):
*52 pro restriction
*11 contro restriction
Second (time restriction):
*15 votes - 5 days
*8 votes - 15 days
*38 votes - 45 days
So, I'd like to know what you think about it and what could be done after
this decision.
Thank you,
Dantadd
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio_Discuss%C3%A3o:Dantadd
__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l