Hoi, I am not championing Sparkle and other wonderful tools. I am adding data and i do no longer have the time. While I applaud your work it does not bring new data like the date of death into Wikidata. It works on the back of the work of the drones like me who add data. Your work while important is secondary and therefore your preferences are secondary.
The primary need is to bring quality information to Wikidata. Quality is not in sources but it is in knowing that there is agreement on the data and where there is not, only then sources become interesting at this stage or our game.
I will blog about the relative worth of sources in the near future. At this time I find it mostly a distraction because we are not working on comparison of data as long as it is not used to bring quality everwhere it does not do what I am looking for. It is concentrating on single facts and not on quality in the first place. Thanks, GerardM
On 4 June 2015 at 10:49, Markus Kroetzsch markus.kroetzsch@tu-dresden.de wrote:
Hi Gerard,
On 04.06.2015 09:26, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, An argument rages about the significance of the English WIkipedia using Wikidata for person data, things like date of death.
I don't see an argument raging anywhere, though you seem to be raging quite a bit ;-) Maybe you have been discussing elsewhere than on the DBpedia or Wikidata mailing lists? (Are the Dutch Wikipedians discussing this maybe? If it's not in English, could you give us a summary of the issues discussed in this argument?)
From my point of view, it would be great if DBpedia could donate some of its data to Wikidata. For example, there could be a bot that imports "date of death" statements from Wikipedia via DBpedia as you suggested. The Wikidata community has imported many statements from Wikipedia in the past and I don't see a big problem doing this with DBpedia in the middle if people feel that this is easier than extracting stuff from Wikipedia right away. I think the reason why it is not done is that nobody has prepared and proposed such a bot yet. If there is nobody from DBpedia who can help with this, maybe the best people to approach would be the bot authors who have helped to import all the existing personal data into Wikidata.
As I wrote in my previous email to the Wikidata list, I would prefer if Wikipedia-scraped data (whether from DBpedia or not) would go through the primary sources tool, to help Wikidata to get rid of all the "imported from Wikipedia" references. But this does not apply to DBpedia specifically in any way.
Anyway, let's not over-dramatise this discussion. If you want to champion this work, you could start by doing a simple query against the DBpedia and Wikidata SPARQL endpoints to count how many dates of death each of these datasets contains right now. The next step would be to use another simple query to display the most recent dates of death so as to compare them. This could give the community a sense of whether a large-scale bot action, a Wikidata game, primary sources, or a simple list of "editing suggestions" could be the right tool of getting the missing data into Wikidata.
Regards,
Markus
DBpedia does a better job than Wikidata does and it does it because they not only use dumps to update their information but they also use information from RSS. Therefore they do a better job than volunteers like myself at Wikidata do.
In my blogpost [1] I argue for cooperation. My point is very much that increasingly I find I do no longer have the time to maintain the data for people who died in 2014 or 2015. I have done that the last two years..
I desperately want to do other things with Wikidata, things that are more relevant. PLEASE consider cooperating with the DBpedia people. They are part of our ecosystem, they want to share and they want to make their data available with our license. Thanks, GerardM
[1]
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2015/06/english-wikipedia-and-those-who-d...
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
-- Markus Kroetzsch Faculty of Computer Science Technische Universität Dresden +49 351 463 38486 http://korrekt.org/
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Hello all,
Could we keep this discussion on one mailing list (or at least on all of them consistently if possible please? I'm missing out on parts of the conversation :-)
Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
*Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
On 4 June 2015 at 10:20, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, I am not championing Sparkle and other wonderful tools. I am adding data and i do no longer have the time. While I applaud your work it does not bring new data like the date of death into Wikidata. It works on the back of the work of the drones like me who add data. Your work while important is secondary and therefore your preferences are secondary.
The primary need is to bring quality information to Wikidata. Quality is not in sources but it is in knowing that there is agreement on the data and where there is not, only then sources become interesting at this stage or our game.
I will blog about the relative worth of sources in the near future. At this time I find it mostly a distraction because we are not working on comparison of data as long as it is not used to bring quality everwhere it does not do what I am looking for. It is concentrating on single facts and not on quality in the first place. Thanks, GerardM
On 4 June 2015 at 10:49, Markus Kroetzsch markus.kroetzsch@tu-dresden.de wrote:
Hi Gerard,
On 04.06.2015 09:26, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, An argument rages about the significance of the English WIkipedia using Wikidata for person data, things like date of death.
I don't see an argument raging anywhere, though you seem to be raging quite a bit ;-) Maybe you have been discussing elsewhere than on the DBpedia or Wikidata mailing lists? (Are the Dutch Wikipedians discussing this maybe? If it's not in English, could you give us a summary of the issues discussed in this argument?)
From my point of view, it would be great if DBpedia could donate some of its data to Wikidata. For example, there could be a bot that imports
"date
of death" statements from Wikipedia via DBpedia as you suggested. The Wikidata community has imported many statements from Wikipedia in the
past
and I don't see a big problem doing this with DBpedia in the middle if people feel that this is easier than extracting stuff from Wikipedia
right
away. I think the reason why it is not done is that nobody has prepared
and
proposed such a bot yet. If there is nobody from DBpedia who can help
with
this, maybe the best people to approach would be the bot authors who have helped to import all the existing personal data into Wikidata.
As I wrote in my previous email to the Wikidata list, I would prefer if Wikipedia-scraped data (whether from DBpedia or not) would go through the primary sources tool, to help Wikidata to get rid of all the "imported
from
Wikipedia" references. But this does not apply to DBpedia specifically in any way.
Anyway, let's not over-dramatise this discussion. If you want to champion this work, you could start by doing a simple query against the DBpedia
and
Wikidata SPARQL endpoints to count how many dates of death each of these datasets contains right now. The next step would be to use another simple query to display the most recent dates of death so as to compare them.
This
could give the community a sense of whether a large-scale bot action, a Wikidata game, primary sources, or a simple list of "editing suggestions" could be the right tool of getting the missing data into Wikidata.
Regards,
Markus
DBpedia does a better job than Wikidata does and it does it because they not only use dumps to update their information but they also use information from RSS. Therefore they do a better job than volunteers like myself at Wikidata do.
In my blogpost [1] I argue for cooperation. My point is very much that increasingly I find I do no longer have the time to maintain the data for people who died in 2014 or 2015. I have done that the last two
years..
I desperately want to do other things with Wikidata, things that are more relevant. PLEASE consider cooperating with the DBpedia people. They are part of our ecosystem, they want to share and they want to make their data available with our license. Thanks, GerardM
[1]
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2015/06/english-wikipedia-and-those-who-d...
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
-- Markus Kroetzsch Faculty of Computer Science Technische Universität Dresden +49 351 463 38486 http://korrekt.org/
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org