While reading the detailed "Legal and Community Advocacy/LCA Announcement", on http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal/LCA_Announcement , I stumbled upon the following sentence: "We would like to build a community advisory board to reinforce our commitment to a global perspective while understanding and promoting communities beyond English Wikipedia". This was quite a big news for me - and something worth much more than a simple side sentence in the details section of a department reshuffling announcement, so I'll be starting this thread.
As many will know, I have always been a supporter of the Wikimedia Foundation asking more structural feedback and active input from the community. I don't believe myself that this 'Foundation-l' is the best venue for that, nor any of the other communication channels we have at our availability right now. In the past I have proposed a "Volunteer Council" which the board did not want to back up and died in silence. In the past several other mechanisms with similar goals have been proposed.
So, at this announcement I see a good side - this 'community advisory board' could bring us exactly that: a more structural approach to getting continuous community input on Foundation governance decisions - other than having a board member election every two years. If we were to call it 'community advisory board' (who cares about the name) and still give it the same rights (right for information, right to be asked for its opinion before certain decisions are being made, right to give unasked advice, right to veto certain decisions even?) then it would be great news. But somehow I don't have the feeling that this department is aiming for that.
So I hope it can be elaborated a bit what is a) the authority of this advisory board (who decided to build it - board, ED or team), b) what will be the purpose and c) what will be the rights. I know you won't have all detailed answers yet because you need to enter a consultation process with the community before setting such steps (which I am grateful for) but I would like to get a little more insight in the direction you want to aim for.
Finally, I hope that in case this 'advisory board' is indeed toothless and very topic centered, I hope that this is being made obvious in its name as well. And I hope too that this wouldn't hold back people from keeping asking for a 'real' volunteer council.
Best, Lodewijk
Since I obviously think it was a good suggestion, I think it is good to provide a link
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikicouncil/Resolution
Cheers Yaroslav
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:54:35 +0100, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.org wrote:
While reading the detailed "Legal and Community Advocacy/LCA
Announcement",
on http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal/LCA_Announcement , I stumbled upon the following sentence: "We would like to build a community
advisory
board to reinforce our commitment to a global perspective while understanding and promoting communities beyond English Wikipedia". This
was
quite a big news for me - and something worth much more than a simple
side
sentence in the details section of a department reshuffling
announcement,
so I'll be starting this thread.
As many will know, I have always been a supporter of the Wikimedia Foundation asking more structural feedback and active input from the community. I don't believe myself that this 'Foundation-l' is the best venue for that, nor any of the other communication channels we have at
our
availability right now. In the past I have proposed a "Volunteer
Council"
which the board did not want to back up and died in silence. In the past several other mechanisms with similar goals have been proposed.
So, at this announcement I see a good side - this 'community advisory board' could bring us exactly that: a more structural approach to
getting
continuous community input on Foundation governance decisions - other
than
having a board member election every two years. If we were to call it 'community advisory board' (who cares about the name) and still give it
the
same rights (right for information, right to be asked for its opinion before certain decisions are being made, right to give unasked advice, right to veto certain decisions even?) then it would be great news. But somehow I don't have the feeling that this department is aiming for
that.
So I hope it can be elaborated a bit what is a) the authority of this advisory board (who decided to build it - board, ED or team), b) what
will
be the purpose and c) what will be the rights. I know you won't have all detailed answers yet because you need to enter a consultation process
with
the community before setting such steps (which I am grateful for) but I would like to get a little more insight in the direction you want to aim for.
Finally, I hope that in case this 'advisory board' is indeed toothless
and
very topic centered, I hope that this is being made obvious in its name
as
well. And I hope too that this wouldn't hold back people from keeping asking for a 'real' volunteer council.
Best, Lodewijk _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org