I agree it would make sense in larger wiki's, but I
would hate to see this become the default set-up.
Birgitte SB
--- Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think it makes sense, though, because it would
help prevent abuse.
Mark
On 10/04/07, FloNight <sydney.poore(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 4/10/07, Delphine Ménard
<notafishz(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
How about giving adminship not as a package but
as
an "opt-in" thing?
You could become a "banner". Or a "blocker". Or a
"protector". Or a
"deletor". Or all of those, or any of
those you
choose to be. Not
everyone knows how to use or can use wisely all
the admin "powers".
Breaking them into what people really need could
be a step towards
breaking the XP gain thing and levelling up to be
an admin.
You'd run for one of those or all of those and
provide explicit
reasons why you chose those options and not those
others.
==============================================
This has been suggested before. It has some merit.
One problem is that a
user might need to go through multiple RFAs. I
think that might make the RFA
situation worse since we might begin over
analyzing the traits a user really
needs for each skill. This type of over analysis
is what many of us think is
> the problem with RFA on EN Wikipedia now.
>
> Sydney
>
On 4/10/07, Delphine Ménard
<notafishz(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On 4/10/07, Sebastian Moleski <sebmol(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On 4/10/07, Brianna Laugher
<brianna.laugher(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I would just like some people to share some
experiences and ideas
they
> > > have from other wikis, since the
only two
I know well are English
> > > Wikipedia and Commons.
> >
> >
> > If you're looking for unique or unusual ways
of selecting admins,
> > Wikiversity may be an interesting
project for
you. After some
> discussion, we
> > decided on a few intersting points. First,
admins would be called
> custodians
> > to better resemble the behind-the-scenes yet
very important role they
> have.
> > Candidates for custodianship have to go
through a four week mentorship
> > period during which they have all the
"powers"
regular custodians have.
> In
> > order to do that, they need to secure a
mentor, generally defined as a
> > custodian with at least 6 months
experience as
a custodian (or admin on
> > another project).
> >
> > After the four weeks, the mentor writes an
evaluation for the
candidate.
> If
> > the evaluation is negative, admin rights are
removed from the candidate
> > unless he can secure a new mentor. If
the
evaluation is positive,
> there's a
> > five day period for comments from the
community after which a
bureaucrat
> > makes the final decision. There is no
vote in
this process.
>
> \o/
>
> I love this.
>
> Thank you for sharing this unusual and yet so
much closer to reality
> piece of wiki world.
>
> A few weeks ago, a few en: editors and I were
sitting in a room and we
> came up with the following idea (or was it
with
the Italians strolling
> outside in cold weather?):
>
> How about giving adminship not as a package but
as an "opt-in"
thing?
>
> You could become a "banner". Or a "blocker". Or
a
"protector". Or a
>
"deletor". Or all of those, or any
of those you
choose to be. Not
>
everyone knows how to use or can use wisely
all
the admin "powers".
>
Breaking them into what people really need
could
be a step towards
> breaking the XP gain thing and levelling up
to
be an admin.
>
> You'd run for one of those or all of those and
provide explicit
> reasons why you chose those options and not
those others.
>
> I know there is a technical barrier for that
now, but I seem to
> remember hearing that it could be pretty
easily
lifted.
>
> An idea. (you did ask for ideas too Brianna,
didn't you? :-D)
>
> Delphine
>
> --
> ~notafish
> NB. This address is used for mailing lists.
Personal emails sent to
> this address will probably get lost.
> NB. Cette adresse est utilisée pour les listes
de diffusion. Tout
> email personnel envoyé à cette adresse sera
probablement perdu.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.