On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:25 AM, ENWP Pine <deyntestiss(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
With that in mind, and since the current state of the
RFC on your
proposal, roughly nine days after commenting began, is about 50% for and
50% against in its current form, I would like to offer to work with you on
revitalizing the
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Global_requests_commit…
for a successor RFC, taking into account the comments on that page
and at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Global_bans,
any comments from Philippe about how this committee might be structured in
such a way that WMF would trust it to handle ban requests from the office,
and comments from anyone else who’d like to give input.
Thank you,
Hi Pine,
Following up on this post-Wikimania, it's clear that the nearly 50/50 trend
is continuing, even after the community decided to split the "policy needs
edits" and "no, I hate this idea" groups apart.
In light of that, I am happy to work on alternatives, though to be totally
honest the broader scope of the global requests committee makes it more
challenging and difficult a task, and perhaps something that should be done
with more collaboration with other groups at the Foundation, etc.
Thanks for your thoughtful suggestions, as always.
Steven