What will make it unified? A mythical idea of consensus? What is
consensus, as determined by the assembly? And what makes you think it
would have any authority, after the board rejected the idea of giving
the significantly better planned out Wikicouncil idea any authority?
-Dan
On May 12, 2008, at 12:01 AM, Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
Unlike the Assembly, Meta is not an structured body.
The Assembly
will serve as a unified community voice, not the meta aspects of
projects.
----- Original Message ----
From: Pharos <pharosofalexandria(a)gmail.com>
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 8:15:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Community Assembly
From: Dan Rosenthal <swatjester(a)gmail.com>
What makes it any different than any current list or page?
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at
10:56 PM, Geoffrey Plourde
<geo.plrd(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
As of this point the Community has no leadership
body. This would
step in and fill the void without disenfranchising the collective
voice of the community.
This sounds to me very much like
meta.wikimedia.org.
Thanks,
Pharos
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l