QRpedia is still owned by Roger Bamkin I think http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QRpedia The projects code appears to be open source.
What does this mean for long term stability? How is the site licensed? What authority do the volunteers / cities putting these up involved have over its functioning?
On 8 February 2013 17:53, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
QRpedia is still owned by Roger Bamkin I think http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QRpedia The projects code appears to be open source.
What does this mean for long term stability? How is the site licensed? What authority do the volunteers / cities putting these up involved have over its functioning?
Hi James,
See discussions at http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Water_cooler#QR_codes (and the later thread on the same page), lots of information and discussion there, and the Water Cooler will stay up to date as events progress. I welcome further questions that have not already been raised to be added there, I find it a handy place to reference.
As it happens, the UK Board is reviewing the negotiation tomorrow and there may be an announcement to make then.
Thanks, Fae
Am 08.02.2013 18:53, schrieb James Heilman:
QRpedia is still owned by Roger Bamkin I think http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QRpedia The projects code appears to be open source.
It is. You need to fiddle through it and find the right QR library which is not included, though.
What does this mean for long term stability? How is the site licensed? What authority do the volunteers / cities putting these up involved have over its functioning?
I managed to set up my own instance and got it working. So we have a stand-by system.
/Manuel
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org