Thanks, I spend a hard time digging into Signpost to find any new information, but I just found Wikipedia, Wikipedia, Wikipedia, and lets close Wikinews... Even in "collaboration on breaking news" is about Wikipedia, Anyone knows anything about free journalism? [off-topic] Digging there a saw a lot of complains about WP that could be answered as go to another wiki, e.g.: "Racing books are usually written much more in a sports journalism style, which is not well suited to encyclopedias" >>> go to wikinews.... GNG should have something that WP-fr does to people, but should extend to anything, "qui lui aient consacré un article ou un chapitre, espacées d'au moins deux ans." Breaking news is not encyclopaedic, this kind of construction should be redirect to the Wikinews... we do not know the real impact... and we create things like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Marathon_bombings (less dead people then a car accident), not important at all... 201,425 bytes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_Genocide 1 million people died 125,493 bytes And: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Antonio_mayoral_election,_2015 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Euro_2012 ... All news... people using wikipedia as a newspaper (a very bad one that change the information, and remove pass steps of the history) and they don't know why Wikinews don't grow... Sorry, just ventilating after a few hours reading Wikipediacentrism ... On 8 May 2015 at 00:55, Aleksey Bilogur <aleksey.bilogur(a)gmail.com> wrote: -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton rodrigo.argenton(a)gmail.com +55 11 979 718 884