On 5/7/07, Casey Brown <cbrown1023(a)comcast.net> wrote:
Yes. We are not discussing the philosophy behind this
and why it should not
be so. No matter what you discuss here, it will be a violation of the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMCA> and
will still be breaking the law.
Cbrown1023
-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Jesse Martin
(Pathoschild)
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 5:31 PM
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] 09-f9-...
Hello,
Wikipedia is not a experiment in civil disobedience. Whether or not
the law is absurd, it is nonetheless law. Feel free to convince your
congressperson to get it struck down or militate elsewhere; don't make
Wikimedia content illegal in the US and the European Union just
because you disagree with the law.
Yours cordially,
Jesse Martin (Pathoschild)
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Link to caselaw or court order, please?
The DMCA does indeed prohibit distribution of circumvention devices. I
can't find a thing in it about "numeric values".
--
Freedom is the right to know that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.