Martin Weissman wrote:
There have been a few discussions along the lines of
"doesn't this fit into
WikiBooks or WikiUniversity, or a semantic enhancement thereof". While I
have tried to discuss the differences within the project proposal, perhaps a
few more words should be said about the differences.
I agree with Cormac that this falls wholly within the mandate of
Wikiversity. This direction would have been more appreciated at an
earlier stage.
The primary difference is that the WikiCurriculum
project has semantic
information at its heart, and the needs of (U.S.) school districts as its
motivation. While WikiBooks might attempt to write textbooks to address
standards (such as the A-level math textbooks already there), and
WikiUniversity (and the community college project) might come up with
curricula, the WikiCurriculum project would specifically contain the
information necessary to ensure the mathematical and pedagogical soundness
of textbooks and curricula in general (at least in 9-12 math).
I support the focus on 9-12 math; that clearly emphasizes the importance
of of accomplishing specific goals instead of having a lot of random
material.
I puzzled over the phrase "pedagogical soundness of textbooks". I see
textbooks as tools to be used by the instructors who would be the ones
responsible for the soundness of the pedagogy. I would even be inclined
to challenge the traditional concept of textbook in favour of more
modular materials that are more amenable to local needs.
In this way, the WikiCurriculum project could in fact
facilitate the
creation of courses and textbooks, both by other Wiki projects, as well as
school districts (from which I have already heard a bit of interest).
The WikiCurriculum project would be designed with state and national
standards in mind. I have in mind the NCTM national standards, as well as
California and Massachusetts state standards. I am only mentioning U.S.
standards, simply because these are the standards with which I have
familiarity. I am also mentioning the states CA and MA, because I have some
familiarity with those state standards, and I also have contacts in
mathematics and math education in those states. Of course, I believe that
international standards should be addressed as well, eventually.
International standards can be addressed right from the beginning. Many
of the detailed standards are already on line, or am I inferring too
much from what happens here in British Columbia. See
http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/irp/irp_math.htm for what's available for
mathematics. Note in particular the "Prescribed learning outcomes" in
each package.
Ec