I want to clarify regarding the discussion on the length of the candidates' statements.
There is NO discussion between Imran and myself about invalidating any candidate because of the length of their statements on the Candidate Page. NONE.
One candidate simply pointed out that on that page, people were asked to limit their comments to 500 characters. Without getting into a discussion over whether that number includes spaces or not (and the issue has been raised), the purpose was to allow each candidate to provide a BRIEF summary of their positions on two questions. Much lengthier statements could (and were) be made on the candidates own pages. In fact, there was no limit to the amount of space that could be used there. People could write thousands of words, or they could provide succinct comments about what they believe and the which goals they hope to pursue.
However, one candidate brought up the issue that certain candidates had exceeded the 500 word limit on the Candidates Page and there only. In fairness, and since that was a request by a candidate, I asked the candidates who had exceeded that amount to try and trim their statements. This was done via personal email precisely because I wanted to avoid this kind of ruckus. They were asked to cut out some words and redirect to their user pages. Nowhere was there any talk of disqualifying anyone.
This is not an issue I intend to pursue any further. 15 words more or less on that page is not going to sway the election one way or another. 500 characters was a round figure, chosen arbitrarily, to provide an approximate size of a text that would ensure that the page was readable.
I hope that no one intends to drop out of the race because of this request. I hope all the candidates understand my position on this and will not use this to contest the election, that has been proceeding smoothly so far.
Thank you,
Danny
daniwo59-
However, one candidate brought up the issue that certain candidates had exceeded the 500 word limit on the Candidates Page and there only. In fairness, and since that was a request by a candidate, I asked the candidates who had exceeded that amount to try and trim their statements. This was done via personal email precisely because I wanted to avoid this kind of ruckus. They were asked to cut out some words and redirect to their user pages. Nowhere was there any talk of disqualifying anyone.
Danny, you are confused. First you talk about a 500 character limit, then you talk about a 500 word limit, then you talk about "15 words" over the limit. All of this is inaccurate.
The limit as defined on the candidate page is 1000 characters total. Some candidates are at more than twice that length. Please see the table at http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Election_Candidates
This includes some candidates' use of the "contributions" space for an additional 600+ characters of personal introduction.
This issue can be resolved simply by 1) moving the "contributions lists" to the respective candidate user pages 2) asking the ones who are still substantially over the limit to shorten their statements.
Please address this issue ASAP.
Regards,
Erik
The limit as defined on the candidate page is 1000 characters total.
--------
This is inaccurate. the candidate page mentions that 2 questions should limit themselves to 500 characters maximum. There was no mention of any limitation on other points. There is no mention of a total of 1000 characters anywhere.
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
Erik Moeller wrote: "That is not an argument. If the medium is indeed different, you will have to show how it is so different that the above logic does not apply."
At a meeting time limits are often enforced because time moves equally fast for everyone, people either have to listen to lengthy boring speeches or leave the room. On a web page people have the choice to skip stuff that they don't want to read.
Danny wrote: "I hope that no one intends to drop out of the race because of this request. I hope all the candidates understand my position on this and will not use this to contest the election, that has been proceeding smoothly so far."
Agree, I won't post on this issue again.
Erik Zachte
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org