I would ask from a range of contractors, from companies like Centurion
Risk Assessment Services, 3D Global Solutions, or MVM Inc. Listing
prices and service options is up to the foundation, not me. As for
who's opinion I would accept, I would accept anyone's opinion BUT the
local team. As others have stated, they have a vested interest in
Wikimania, and therefore are more inclined to say "yes yes, no
problem" when in fact, there is a problem.
-Dan
On Apr 18, 2008, at 11:35 PM, Mike Godwin wrote:
Dan Rosenthal writes:
No, I expect an adequate security assessment that
goes beyond asking
people with a vested interest in seeing the event happen smoothly.
The local team has a humongous conflict of interest here. Their "say
so" on whether something is safe is inherently unacceptable.
Okay, identify whom would ask or hire, whose security assessment you
would accept (even if you don't agree with the results), and who will
charge you (or the Foundation) a price you would accept, and that the
Foundation could afford. Please list prices and available service
options.
If you are expert enough to find fault with an FAQ that I published
without negative feedback on this list several weeks ago, surely you
can answer this one small request.
--Mike
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l