I don't know if its important to this discussion, but the UCMJ is a class apart from standard criminal and civil law. I imagine they have some class of civil remedies (fines, surrender of wages, etc.) in addition to criminal penalties (as opposed to having a type of legal action that is categorically not criminal), but not being an expert in the UCMJ at all 'crime' or 'violation' are probably the most accurate terms. Nathan ****** Did anybody read my last post? This passage isn't in the UCMJ. It's an Army regulation. Videmus Omnia is in a different branch of service.
-Durova
Videmus Omnia is USAF if I remember correctly. I have an old army friend who is now a JAG officer and recruiter at Georgetown Law JAG I can get to weigh in if you want.
-Dan On Jan 2, 2008, at 5:42 PM, Durova wrote:
I don't know if its important to this discussion, but the UCMJ is a class apart from standard criminal and civil law. I imagine they have some class of civil remedies (fines, surrender of wages, etc.) in addition to criminal penalties (as opposed to having a type of legal action that is categorically not criminal), but not being an expert in the UCMJ at all 'crime' or 'violation' are probably the most accurate terms. Nathan
Did anybody read my last post? This passage isn't in the UCMJ. It's an Army regulation. Videmus Omnia is in a different branch of service.
-Durova _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Please do.
Mercury
-----Original Message----- From: foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Dan Rosenthal Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 8:58 PM To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Legal obligation to report
Videmus Omnia is USAF if I remember correctly. I have an old army friend who is now a JAG officer and recruiter at Georgetown Law JAG I can get to weigh in if you want.
-Dan On Jan 2, 2008, at 5:42 PM, Durova wrote:
I don't know if its important to this discussion, but the UCMJ is a class apart from standard criminal and civil law. I imagine they have some class of civil remedies (fines, surrender of wages, etc.) in addition to criminal penalties (as opposed to having a type of legal action that is categorically not criminal), but not being an expert in the UCMJ at all 'crime' or 'violation' are probably the most accurate terms. Nathan
Did anybody read my last post? This passage isn't in the UCMJ. It's an Army regulation. Videmus Omnia is in a different branch of service.
-Durova _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Sure. I don't think the up to date USAF regulation is going to differ materially from this one (and even the Army one would seem to exclude most instances of Wikipedia editing) but the question of an affirmative reporting obligation is one where it would be nice to have a legal view from someone familiar with the UCMJ.
On Jan 2, 2008 10:00 PM, NavouWiki navouwiki@gmail.com wrote:
Please do.
Mercury
-----Original Message----- From: foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Dan Rosenthal Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 8:58 PM To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Legal obligation to report
Videmus Omnia is USAF if I remember correctly. I have an old army friend who is now a JAG officer and recruiter at Georgetown Law JAG I can get to weigh in if you want.
-Dan On Jan 2, 2008, at 5:42 PM, Durova wrote:
I don't know if its important to this discussion, but the UCMJ is a class apart from standard criminal and civil law. I imagine they have some class of civil remedies (fines, surrender of wages, etc.) in addition to criminal penalties (as opposed to having a type of legal action that is categorically not criminal), but not being an expert in the UCMJ at all 'crime' or 'violation' are probably the most accurate terms. Nathan
Did anybody read my last post? This passage isn't in the UCMJ. It's an Army regulation. Videmus Omnia is in a different branch of service.
-Durova _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org