Hi All,
Just to react to a few points in this discussion.
1) We did get a lot of community input for connectors and potential candidates (thank you
all for that). We used this list and approached people where we felt this was useful, and
this also generated some interesting leads.
2) For all our “potentials” we have a screening process. That means that a large part will
never be contacted as a potential candidate, simply because they are not close to matching
the profile. We might still approach them as a connector if we feel that this will help us
reach other “potentials”. If you suggested a name, that person might very well not be
contacted at all.
3) The transition team will not be publishing/discussing the merits (or identity) of any
of the people which we have contacted in any public forum like this mailing list. (for all
the reasons mentioned in this thread) Our intend is that we will involve the community
where we feel it is possible and desirable.
4) Even if candidates have publicly announced their interest in the position we will
respect point 3. I do want to publicly state my gratefulness to those candidates that have
decided to invest in applying for the position, even if we do not end up selecting them.
Jan-Bart de Vreede
Chair
Wikimedia Board of Trustees.
PS: There also seems to be some confusion about the re-appointment process for the
founders seat on the Board. Just to confirm: the founders seat is also up for
reappointment every two years. Referring you the minutes of our last meeting
(
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2013-11-24) you will see that a vote took
place on this.