Hello dear all,
I�d like to close these elections by making a few comments, some of them for the past (thoughts on these elections), some for the future.
quelques commentaires....
Merci � Danny et Imran pour avoir fait du bon boulot dans l'organisation des �lections.
First, I�d like to thanks Danny and Imran, who, to my opinion, handled this election well. They were helpful, without being heavy, without being strict :-). Organising it all certainly took a good bunch of hours to both of them, and was a bit tough on them sometimes, so I would really like that we are thankful to them that all went well. On top of it, Danny had to take care of my questions, comments and worries during all the election time, so I would like to give him a particular thank you note for being so patient and caring :-)
Merci � Tim Starling �galement :-)
Second, I�d like to thank Tim, for the neat voting option he set for this election :-) I think it a very good tool for wikimedia-wide decision making. It is great that all results are displayed on all wikis, that we can confortably vote locally, that translations could be provided and so on. Good job :-)
Merci bien sur � tous ceux qui m'ont soutenu.
Third, I would like to thank the numerous wikimedians who offered me their support. It is really warming me up. Now, there really is a lot to do, and I hope Angel and I will help you to achieve our common dream. As usual, it is a team work, and I would like to remind you, that we will be here to represent all of you. We won't be there to decide instead of you. We are all part of a really great project, and everyone has room to participate. None of us know everything, but each of us knows something and can bring his part to the global scheme.
-----
I�d be happy to suggest an improvement or two for the next elections :-) But since this mail is long, I will post them later on the election feedback page.
J'ai quelques suggestions d'am�lioration pour de prochaines �lections. Je les posterais sur meta.
-----
Je suis ravie de l'�lection d'Angel. Et puis, deux femmes au board...
I am very happy that I will have the opportunity to work with Angel. Well, we already know each other quite well, from irc discussion, from our implication in the mediation committee on en, for the time we both spend on meta, for both being steward and ambassadors. Though we both have disagreements sometimes, we manage them.
I am glad the german chapter was created this week end, and hope the french one will be soon.
A propos d'organisations locales, l'association germanophone a �t� fond�e ce week end. J'esp�re que nous aurons un feedback d�taill�e, mais je signale en particulier la nomination de Elian au sein du conseil, en tant que secr�taire. Pour rappel, Elian parle le fran�ais. Pour l'association francophone, il est bien entendu que j'esp�re sa cr�ation sous peu. Je souhaite faire partie du comit� de pilotage, � priori comme simple membre, � la fois par int�r�t propre dans l'association, et pour aider la cr�ation d'autres associations ult�rieurement. J'attend avec impatience notre rencontre � Paris, avec Jimbo et j'esp�re, le plus grand nombre possible de Wikip�diens.
Finally, I would like to repeat something I said on my candidate statement : " I would like that we build a Wikimedia-wide culture of love and respect; and, whoever the candidates elected are, I hope that most people listed here become active participants of the Foundation itself." I think each candidate had a different approach, and these different approaches hold a great diversity which will greatly benefit the project. So, I certainly hope and intend to make it possible, that several of them become heavily implicated in the Foundation itself.
There is a lot of work to do. And the good news is that there really is work for every one who feels like doing something ! We have the members fees system to organise, copyright issues to fix, fundraising to develop, quality control to established on print copies, local chapter setting up, etc...
We need a little bit of time to organise ourselves with Angela (who is probably on her plane back) and with Jimbo (now, nearly on holidays but for the french meeting... Jimbo, you need some real holidays...).
My talk pageS (now, I really need that global watch list feature :-)) and my mail adress are open to you. IRC is also a great way to directly discuss. Please do not hesitate to do so.
Thanks again for your support :-)
Florence/Anthere
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/
Congratulations to Florence and Angela for being elected to the board. I am sure they will both do their best to represent the interests of the community. Thanks to everyone who voted for me, many of them in spite of differences that we may have had in the past.
The full election results absolutely should be published. Everything else would be a travesty.
Erik
--- Erik Moeller erik_moeller@gmx.de wrote:
Congratulations to Florence and Angela for being elected to the board. I am sure they will both do their best to represent the interests of the community. Thanks to everyone who voted for me, many of them in spite of differences that we may have had in the past.
I've already expressed congratulations privately to Florence and Angela but would like to add public congratulations as well. I would also like to thank everyone who voted for me.
The full election results absolutely should be published. Everything else would be a travesty.
I agree but I would not like to see this happen too quickly if there are objections from any candidate. So far, however, I count three candidates who want the figures published and none so far who don't. Let's see what the others have to say.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/
Daniel Mayer wrote:
I agree but I would not like to see this happen too quickly if there are objections from any candidate. So far, however, I count three candidates who want the figures published and none so far who don't. Let's see what the others have to say.
I'd certainly like the figures published, if only out of curiosity to see how many people voted for me (and how many people voted for everyone else as well; I'm a rather curious person and like statistics).
Publishing a detailed breakdown would be neat too, as, again, I like statistics, but that might need some safeguards to avoid giving away individual votes (for example, publishing vote totals for a language from which only a handful of people voted would probably be bad).
-Mark
--- Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
I've already expressed congratulations privately to Florence and Angela but would like to add public congratulations as well. I would also like to thank everyone who voted for me.
Likewise, Angela and Florence: Cheers!
I agree but I would not like to see this happen too quickly if there are objections from any candidate. So far, however, I count three candidates who want the figures published and none so far who don't. Let's see what the others have to say.
no objections.
I was expecting the results to be made public at the same time as any announcement, actually.
===== Christopher Mahan chris_mahan@yahoo.com 818.943.1850 cell http://www.christophermahan.com/
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/
I've already expressed congratulations privately to Florence and Angela but would like to add public congratulations as well. I would also like to thank everyone who voted for me.
:-)
Well, thanks to all the candidates who expressed congratulations. As I already said yesterday, I hope we can all work together to make the Foundation truely real.
The full election results absolutely should be
published. Everything else
would be a travesty.
<> I agree but I would not like to see this happen too
quickly if there are objections from any candidate. So far, however, I count three candidates who want the figures published and none so far who don't. Let's see what the others have to say.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
I have been thinking about that very carefully today, to check if what I was thinking a little while ago was really a good opinion or not a good opinion.
I also read one morning, the discussion which occurred on irc on the topic. I tried to weight all arguments.
And after careful consideration, I think the results should be released entirely (but for the smallest wikipedias, as it would remove anonymisation of the vote when only 1 to 5 people voted).
If only for one reason : transparency. We should not build the Foundation upon bricks of secret.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/
Anthere wrote:
If only for one reason : transparency. We should not build the Foundation upon bricks of secret.
If have no objection, and leave it up to the candidates and the election organizers to make a decision. If there is a big big fight about it, I am happy to decide I guess, but hopefully...
Of course, I am not so sure how meaningful the numbers are. From looking at the numbers, it seems obvious to me that a great number of people followed my desire and advice that we focus on non-American candidates to give the board some international character.
So low votes for some candidates should not be interpreted as people not liking or approving of them, but more of them not being well known or else of them being American.
--Jimbo
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org