In a message dated 11/30/2005 6:00:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, brion@pobox.com writes:
This'll be a complete waste; no one will ever look at the "frozen" wiki and it'll be ignored. (Being 'wiki' or not is not relevant; it'll simply never ever been seen. To be useful, the stable versions need to be right out front and fully integrated into *.wikipedia.org where people are already looking.)
What we need is a tagging system within the wiki, for a review team to use to mark certain revisions in certain states.
Articles with verified revisions will show those by default to the public, with a notice at the top of the screen about their status and if there are newer edits available.
Articles without verified revisions will have a notice at the top that they haven't been reviewed, making clear the 'in-progress' state of the system. I suggested a validation scheme like this about two years ago on meta.
Danny
daniwo59@aol.com wrote:
Articles without verified revisions will have a notice at the top that they haven't been reviewed, making clear the 'in-progress' state of the system.
I suggested a validation scheme like this about two years ago on meta.
Many of us have been saying we should do this for two or three years, including you, me, Erik, and others. But it hasn't got done yet.
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org