Hi all,
Yes, I know that in large organizations it is uncommon to approve minutes by
email. I however see no fundamental obstacles myself, but I'd love to hear
from them if they are there. Please note that "commonness" is no argument to
me in this case. I understand how we got to the current situation, but that
is not what I want to discuss. I'd like to discuss a change in that
situation :)
It is about minutes, not about opinions. The only thing that should be
judged while publishing is 1) whether they reflect the truth and 2) whether
there is anything in there that should remain non-disclosed. Both can in
principle perfectly be considered by email imho.
A summary is something, but personally I prefer the real resolutions and
minutes :) In general they are not too extensive anyway in this
organization.
And, as Thomas pointed out, this *is* an unusual organization. Not only are
there many volunteers, but there are also a lot of chapters who are
dependent in some way of these resolutions. These can influence their
functioning quite a lot, and only recieve the minutes together with the
general public. But of course, again, if there are heavy arguments not to do
this, I'd love to hear of them :)
Thank you Ting, for taking it to the board. I hope that in the future, the
community and chapters can more actively participate in the movement :)
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2008/12/14 Ting Chen <wing.philopp(a)gmx.de>
The chair of the board, Michael, had posted the topics
before the
meeting and a short report about resolutions and issues discussed after
the meeting.
Ting
Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 5:49 AM, effe iets
anders
<effeietsanders(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
> From Sue's report, I understood that the current practice is to have
board
> minutes approved only on the next board
meeting. In practice that means
a
> delay of several months. In a quickly
changing world as ours, that is
quite
a long
time span.
That's a fairly standard practice. How would you approve the minutes
without holding a meeting? (Sure, you could do it using a unanimous
consent
resolution, but that's certainly not
typical.)
Would it be possible to decrease this time span somehow, and approve the
> minutes on an earlier moment? In that way, the volunteers can be kept
more
> up to date, the board would work more
transparently and better ways to
> interact and react on decisions made. Because if minutes are published
> months afterwards, the motivation to read them and react on it is
obviously
> much lower then when they actually still have
a direct meaning and are
more
> or less recent. Besides that, if the
community has imput on the
decisions
> made, they could give it, and it could be
discussed in that next board
> meeting, and not only the one after that (delay 6 months).
>
> I sincerely hope the board will find a way to publish the minutes
within,
say, two
weeks to a month :)
Publishing a draft of the minutes (or an informal summary of the meeting)
would be one thing. Approving the official minutes is quite another.
Are the meetings considered confidential? If not, there's nothing
stopping
any board member from providing a summary at any
time. If so, well, then
why publish the minutes in the first place?
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l