So how cool is this?
Refresh the page, click a few links, ... anyone see any attribution?
Teofilo check your moral rights, I think they have been mislaid.
On 6 March 2011 10:40, ???? wiki-list@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
So how cool is this?
Refresh the page, click a few links, ... anyone see any attribution?
Teofilo check your moral rights, I think they have been mislaid.
Using Wikipedia articles to get a domain squatting page that appears reasonably high on search results is, regretably, not a new idea. This is a rather impressive example though.
On 06/03/2011 15:23, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 6 March 2011 10:40, ????wiki-list@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
So how cool is this?
Refresh the page, click a few links, ... anyone see any attribution?
Teofilo check your moral rights, I think they have been mislaid.
Using Wikipedia articles to get a domain squatting page that appears reasonably high on search results is, regretably, not a new idea. This is a rather impressive example though.
So impressive they have forgotten to do the attribution bit, thus one huge copyvio.
Are you sure it isn't a theme preview site? ;)
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:00 PM, ???? wiki-list@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 06/03/2011 15:23, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 6 March 2011 10:40, ????wiki-list@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
So how cool is this?
Refresh the page, click a few links, ... anyone see any attribution?
Teofilo check your moral rights, I think they have been mislaid.
Using Wikipedia articles to get a domain squatting page that appears reasonably high on search results is, regretably, not a new idea. This is a rather impressive example though.
So impressive they have forgotten to do the attribution bit, thus one huge copyvio.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org