My advice would definitely be to email functionaries-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org.
Keeping them in the loop is very, very helpful.
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
*Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control
over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
On 27 January 2013 23:43, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This happens all the time. It sounds like their
attempt to alter the
content was thwarted. If not, alert a few admins privately, or send more
specific info to the functionaries-en mailing list so they can keep a
watchful eye on the articles in question.
And talk to the offender and explain what they did contravenes Wikipedia
guidelines.
In my opinion you should report it to an ethics board privately, if you
believe they did (intend to) break the industries ethical guidelines. Even
if they acted improperly, by intimidating someone, you need to follow
appropriate protocols. Two wrongs dont make a right.
It sounds like you can inform press without breaking any confidences. Tell
them the account name or IP and let them independently guess who it is.
John Vandenberg.
sent from Galaxy Note
On Jan 22, 2013 12:09 AM, "James Heilman" <jmh649(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A not really hypothetical question:
Let say one is the director of marketing at a 16 billion dollar company
and
decides to come to Wikipedia in an attempt to
alter its coverage of one
of
your companies key products (which has been hit
fairly hard lately by the
evidence). One also invites 50 of your best friends (most of which are on
your pay role to join you in this effort).
Let say you are trying to do it anonymously but both you and your
associates send out a whole bunch of intimidating emails to a long
standing
editor. Than this long standing editor without
any real difficulty
figures
out who you are (as you sort of did email him).
You than "vanish" from
Wikipedia.
What if this long standing editor decided to either hand the story over
to
the press or write something up for publication
in a peer review journal
as
said editor does not stand for intimidation
easily? And this long
standing
editor believes that the world / patients might
be better off if
this behavior become more widely known. How would the Wikimedia community
apply the above two policies / guidelines (WP:COI and WP:OUTING)?
--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l