Most of the issues where addressed. And they only way to determine if many of the concerns hold water is to simply try it. A travel guide will likely be heavily read and edited.
As a comparison their are an approximately an equal number of medical articles on Wikipedia to travel articles. Yet the travel articles had a much higher number of dedicated editors. I hope that you Thomas do not see this as justification to delete the medical project? Also if you look at readership on Wikipedia. We have many thousands of article that receive little to no viewership I do not consider this viewership justification for deleting them.
On 23 August 2012 14:56, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Most of the issues where addressed. And they only way to determine if many of the concerns hold water is to simply try it. A travel guide will likely be heavily read and edited.
As a comparison their are an approximately an equal number of medical articles on Wikipedia to travel articles. Yet the travel articles had a much higher number of dedicated editors. I hope that you Thomas do not see this as justification to delete the medical project? Also if you look at readership on Wikipedia. We have many thousands of article that receive little to no viewership I do not consider this viewership justification for deleting them.
You're building straw men there.
I am just griping; we'll see if I end up being right or not I suppose.
Tom
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org