On 23 August 2012 14:56, James Heilman <jmh649(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Most of the issues where addressed. And they only way
to determine if many
of the concerns hold water is to simply try it. A travel guide will likely
be heavily read and edited.
As a comparison their are an approximately an equal number of medical
articles on Wikipedia to travel articles. Yet the travel articles had a
much higher number of dedicated editors. I hope that you Thomas do not see
this as justification to delete the medical project? Also if you look at
readership on Wikipedia. We have many thousands of article that receive
little to no viewership I do not consider this viewership justification for
deleting them.
You're building straw men there.
I am just griping; we'll see if I end up being right or not I suppose.
Tom