Quote from full announcement http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
We have released over a million imageshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibraryonto Flickr Commons for anyone to use, remix and repurpose. These images
were taken from the pages of 17th, 18th and 19th century books digitised by Microsofthttp://pressandpolicy.bl.uk/Press-Releases/The-British-Library-19th-Century-Book-Digitisation-Project-343.aspxwho then generously gifted the scanned images to us, allowing us to release them back into the Public Domain. The images themselves cover a startling mix of subjects: There are maps, geological diagrams, beautiful illustrations, comical satire, illuminated and decorative letters, colourful illustrations, landscapes, wall-paintings and so much more that even we are not aware of.
Flickr account http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary Example of image http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11307195524/ Example of all images from a book http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/tags/sysnum002660292 Stuff for coders https://github.com/BL-Labs/imagedirectory
So... :-)
Thanks for the news.
A question comes to my mind when I read this article: Why did the British Library use Flickr instead of Wikimedia Commons? Maybe it has to do something with a better usability of Flickr? -
The usability of Wikimedia Commons most be increased to make it more attractive to individual and institutional users. Don't you think so?
The next steps mentioned in the article indicates good opportunities for us to get involved and show the potential of an experienced platform for crowdsourcing information and knowledge:
"We are looking for new, inventive ways to navigate, find and display these 'unseen illustrations'. and furtheron in the blogpost, "We plan to launch a crowdsourcing application at the beginning of next year, to help describe what the images portray. Our intention is to use this data to train automated classifiers that will run against the whole of the content."
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
Best regards,
Jens
2013/12/15 Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada emijrp@gmail.com
Quote from full announcement
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
We have released over a million imageshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibraryonto Flickr Commons for anyone to use, remix and repurpose. These images
were taken from the pages of 17th, 18th and 19th century books digitised by Microsoft<
http://pressandpolicy.bl.uk/Press-Releases/The-British-Library-19th-Century-... then generously gifted the scanned images to us, allowing us to release
them back into the Public Domain. The images themselves cover a startling mix of subjects: There are maps, geological diagrams, beautiful illustrations, comical satire, illuminated and decorative letters, colourful illustrations, landscapes, wall-paintings and so much more that even we are not aware of.
Flickr account http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary Example of image http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11307195524/ Example of all images from a book http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/tags/sysnum002660292 Stuff for coders https://github.com/BL-Labs/imagedirectory
So... :-) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Just discovered a short note of Andrew Gray, why Flickr was preferred instead of Commons. http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2013/mechanical-curator-on-commons/
2013/12/15 Jens Best jens.best@wikimedia.de
Thanks for the news.
A question comes to my mind when I read this article: Why did the British Library use Flickr instead of Wikimedia Commons? Maybe it has to do something with a better usability of Flickr? -
The usability of Wikimedia Commons most be increased to make it more attractive to individual and institutional users. Don't you think so?
The next steps mentioned in the article indicates good opportunities for us to get involved and show the potential of an experienced platform for crowdsourcing information and knowledge:
"We are looking for new, inventive ways to navigate, find and display these 'unseen illustrations'. and furtheron in the blogpost, "We plan to launch a crowdsourcing application at the beginning of next year, to help describe what the images portray. Our intention is to use this data to train automated classifiers that will run against the whole of the content."
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
Best regards,
Jens
2013/12/15 Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada emijrp@gmail.com
Quote from full announcement
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
We have released over a million imageshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibraryonto Flickr Commons for anyone to use, remix and repurpose. These images
were taken from the pages of 17th, 18th and 19th century books digitised by Microsoft<
http://pressandpolicy.bl.uk/Press-Releases/The-British-Library-19th-Century-... then generously gifted the scanned images to us, allowing us to release
them back into the Public Domain. The images themselves cover a
startling
mix of subjects: There are maps, geological diagrams, beautiful illustrations, comical satire, illuminated and decorative letters, colourful illustrations, landscapes, wall-paintings and so much more
that
even we are not aware of.
Flickr account http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary Example of image http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11307195524/ Example of all images from a book http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/tags/sysnum002660292 Stuff for coders https://github.com/BL-Labs/imagedirectory
So... :-) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Jens Best Präsidium Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. web: http://www.wikimedia.de mail: jens.best http://goog_17221883@wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
There’s been quite a lot of discussion of this on the cultural-partners mailing list (https://intern.wikimedia.ch/lists/listinfo/cultural-partners). As a result of that, Tom Morris has set up a working page on Commons at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:British_Library/Mechanical_Curato...
Thanks, Mike
On 15 Dec 2013, at 17:37, Jens Best jens.best@wikimedia.de wrote:
Just discovered a short note of Andrew Gray, why Flickr was preferred instead of Commons. http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2013/mechanical-curator-on-commons/
2013/12/15 Jens Best jens.best@wikimedia.de
Thanks for the news.
A question comes to my mind when I read this article: Why did the British Library use Flickr instead of Wikimedia Commons? Maybe it has to do something with a better usability of Flickr? -
The usability of Wikimedia Commons most be increased to make it more attractive to individual and institutional users. Don't you think so?
The next steps mentioned in the article indicates good opportunities for us to get involved and show the potential of an experienced platform for crowdsourcing information and knowledge:
"We are looking for new, inventive ways to navigate, find and display these 'unseen illustrations'. and furtheron in the blogpost, "We plan to launch a crowdsourcing application at the beginning of next year, to help describe what the images portray. Our intention is to use this data to train automated classifiers that will run against the whole of the content."
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
Best regards,
Jens
2013/12/15 Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada emijrp@gmail.com
Quote from full announcement
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
We have released over a million imageshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibraryonto Flickr Commons for anyone to use, remix and repurpose. These images
were taken from the pages of 17th, 18th and 19th century books digitised by Microsoft<
http://pressandpolicy.bl.uk/Press-Releases/The-British-Library-19th-Century-... then generously gifted the scanned images to us, allowing us to release
them back into the Public Domain. The images themselves cover a
startling
mix of subjects: There are maps, geological diagrams, beautiful illustrations, comical satire, illuminated and decorative letters, colourful illustrations, landscapes, wall-paintings and so much more
that
even we are not aware of.
Flickr account http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary Example of image http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11307195524/ Example of all images from a book http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/tags/sysnum002660292 Stuff for coders https://github.com/BL-Labs/imagedirectory
So... :-) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Jens Best Präsidium Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. web: http://www.wikimedia.de mail: jens.best http://goog_17221883@wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
--
Jens Best Präsidium Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. web: http://www.wikimedia.de mail: jens.best http://goog_17221883@wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Just discovered the Commons project-site, too. Good to break down the massive amount of unsorted material in countries first. Could help to address interested editors quicker.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:British_Library/Mechanical_Curato...
Jens
2013/12/15 Michael Peel email@mikepeel.net
There’s been quite a lot of discussion of this on the cultural-partners mailing list (https://intern.wikimedia.ch/lists/listinfo/cultural-partners). As a result of that, Tom Morris has set up a working page on Commons at:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:British_Library/Mechanical_Curato...
Thanks, Mike
On 15 Dec 2013, at 17:37, Jens Best jens.best@wikimedia.de wrote:
Just discovered a short note of Andrew Gray, why Flickr was preferred instead of Commons. http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2013/mechanical-curator-on-commons/
2013/12/15 Jens Best jens.best@wikimedia.de
Thanks for the news.
A question comes to my mind when I read this article: Why did the
British
Library use Flickr instead of Wikimedia Commons? Maybe it has to do something with a better usability of Flickr? -
The usability of Wikimedia Commons most be increased to make it more attractive to individual and institutional users. Don't you think so?
The next steps mentioned in the article indicates good opportunities for us to get involved and show the potential of an experienced platform for crowdsourcing information and knowledge:
"We are looking for new, inventive ways to navigate, find and display these 'unseen illustrations'. and furtheron in the blogpost, "We plan to launch a crowdsourcing application at the beginning of next year, to
help
describe what the images portray. Our intention is to use this data to train automated classifiers that will run against the whole of the
content."
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
Best regards,
Jens
2013/12/15 Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada emijrp@gmail.com
Quote from full announcement
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
We have released over a million imageshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibraryonto Flickr Commons for anyone to use, remix and repurpose. These images
were taken from the pages of 17th, 18th and 19th century books
digitised
by Microsoft<
http://pressandpolicy.bl.uk/Press-Releases/The-British-Library-19th-Century-...
who
then generously gifted the scanned images to us, allowing us to release
them back into the Public Domain. The images themselves cover a
startling
mix of subjects: There are maps, geological diagrams, beautiful illustrations, comical satire, illuminated and decorative letters, colourful illustrations, landscapes, wall-paintings and so much more
that
even we are not aware of.
Flickr account http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary Example of image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11307195524/
Example of all images from a book http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/tags/sysnum002660292 Stuff for coders https://github.com/BL-Labs/imagedirectory
So... :-) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Jens Best Präsidium Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. web: http://www.wikimedia.de mail: jens.best http://goog_17221883@wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
--
Jens Best Präsidium Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. web: http://www.wikimedia.de mail: jens.best http://goog_17221883@wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
I was just about to respond with this :-)
I discussed this with the BL team a few weeks before the release, and while we could sort out the technical issues of a million items fairly easily, it looked like the lack of metadata would make them very unsuited for Commons.
There's nothing stopping us harvesting them individually, of course, but I think adding a million unidentified images and saying "the community will sort them out" would be a very quick road to my getting beaten up ;-)
Andrew.
On 15 December 2013 17:37, Jens Best jens.best@wikimedia.de wrote:
Just discovered a short note of Andrew Gray, why Flickr was preferred instead of Commons. http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2013/mechanical-curator-on-commons/
2013/12/15 Jens Best jens.best@wikimedia.de
Thanks for the news.
A question comes to my mind when I read this article: Why did the British Library use Flickr instead of Wikimedia Commons? Maybe it has to do something with a better usability of Flickr? -
The usability of Wikimedia Commons most be increased to make it more attractive to individual and institutional users. Don't you think so?
The next steps mentioned in the article indicates good opportunities for us to get involved and show the potential of an experienced platform for crowdsourcing information and knowledge:
"We are looking for new, inventive ways to navigate, find and display these 'unseen illustrations'. and furtheron in the blogpost, "We plan to launch a crowdsourcing application at the beginning of next year, to help describe what the images portray. Our intention is to use this data to train automated classifiers that will run against the whole of the content."
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
Best regards,
Jens
2013/12/15 Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada emijrp@gmail.com
Quote from full announcement
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi...
We have released over a million imageshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibraryonto Flickr Commons for anyone to use, remix and repurpose. These images
were taken from the pages of 17th, 18th and 19th century books digitised by Microsofthttp://pressandpolicy.bl.uk/Press-Releases/The-British-Library-19th-Century-Book-Digitisation-Project-343.aspxwho then generously gifted the scanned images to us, allowing us to release them back into the Public Domain. The images themselves cover a startling mix of subjects: There are maps, geological diagrams, beautiful illustrations, comical satire, illuminated and decorative letters, colourful illustrations, landscapes, wall-paintings and so much more that even we are not aware of.
Flickr account http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary Example of image http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11307195524/ Example of all images from a book http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/tags/sysnum002660292 Stuff for coders https://github.com/BL-Labs/imagedirectory
So... :-) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Jens Best Präsidium Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. web: http://www.wikimedia.de mail: jens.best@wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
--
Jens Best Präsidium Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. web: http://www.wikimedia.de mail: jens.best@wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
On 15/12/2013 17:05, Jens Best wrote:
Thanks for the news.
A question comes to my mind when I read this article: Why did the British Library use Flickr instead of Wikimedia Commons?
This:
"We plan to launch a crowdsourcing application at the beginning of next year, to help describe what the images portray."
The images release contained no image-level metadata == One million uncategorised images == Commons community raise up in arms
Katie
2013/12/15 Katie Chan ktc@ktchan.info:
"We plan to launch a crowdsourcing application at the beginning of next year, to help describe what the images portray."
The images release contained no image-level metadata == One million uncategorised images == Commons community raise up in arms
It does not really make a difference whether you release a million images without metadata to Flickr, or to Commons. It comes without any metadata, so it cannot be searched (and images cannot be found) in either case. :(
Regards, Jürgen.
On 12/15/2013 12:48 PM, Juergen Fenn wrote:
2013/12/15 Katie Chan ktc@ktchan.info:
"We plan to launch a crowdsourcing application at the beginning of next year, to help describe what the images portray."
The images release contained no image-level metadata == One million uncategorised images == Commons community raise up in arms
It does not really make a difference whether you release a million images without metadata to Flickr, or to Commons. It comes without any metadata, so it cannot be searched (and images cannot be found) in either case. :(
As Andrew said, the interesting question is whether the Commons community can effectively help curate/add metadata for this unidentified content.
I agree with Andy (see http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2013/mechanical-curator-on-commons/#commen...) that tools for easier curation will be quite helpful.
Matt Flaschen
On 17 December 2013 20:08, Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen@gatech.eduwrote:
As Andrew said, the interesting question is whether the Commons community can effectively help curate/add metadata for this unidentified content.
Even if we could a lot of the images could do with some preprocessing to remove things like stray text.
I like the stray text around the images - it shows that the picture is from a book, rather than a separate unattached file like a photo or engraving, and the captions are necessary in most cases. The problematic images are the ones of letterheads and margin decorations, which, though perhaps interesting for articles on publishing or printing, are not really useful in the quantities available unless Wikisource is able to ingest the books in such a way that they use those too. As I understand it however, you cannot recycle a Commons image in a djvu file (yet). I do think some of the more encyclopedic books would be great to have in their entirety on Wikisource.
2013/12/18, geni geniice@gmail.com:
On 17 December 2013 20:08, Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen@gatech.eduwrote:
As Andrew said, the interesting question is whether the Commons community can effectively help curate/add metadata for this unidentified content.
Even if we could a lot of the images could do with some preprocessing to remove things like stray text.
-- geni _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
I did put a few of the books up in the past (as PDFs provided by the BL, then manually converted to DjVu):
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kennedy,_Robert_John_-_A_Journey_in_... https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kennedy,_Robert_John_-_A_Journey_in_... https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Journey_in_Khorassan_and_Central_Asia
I kept running into size limits & wasn't quite sure how best to get the right material to Wikisource, but if there's particular titles, let me know & I'll see what can be done.
On 19 December 2013 09:07, Jane Darnell jane023@gmail.com wrote:
I like the stray text around the images - it shows that the picture is from a book, rather than a separate unattached file like a photo or engraving, and the captions are necessary in most cases. The problematic images are the ones of letterheads and margin decorations, which, though perhaps interesting for articles on publishing or printing, are not really useful in the quantities available unless Wikisource is able to ingest the books in such a way that they use those too. As I understand it however, you cannot recycle a Commons image in a djvu file (yet). I do think some of the more encyclopedic books would be great to have in their entirety on Wikisource.
2013/12/18, geni geniice@gmail.com:
On 17 December 2013 20:08, Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen@gatech.eduwrote:
As Andrew said, the interesting question is whether the Commons community can effectively help curate/add metadata for this unidentified content.
Even if we could a lot of the images could do with some preprocessing to remove things like stray text.
-- geni _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
On 19 December 2013 09:07, Jane Darnell jane023@gmail.com wrote:
I like the stray text around the images - it shows that the picture is from a book, rather than a separate unattached file like a photo or engraving, and the captions are necessary in most cases.
Not for use in articles. For example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eaton_Socon_Castle
On 15 December 2013 17:39, Katie Chan ktc@ktchan.info wrote:
The images release contained no image-level metadata == One million uncategorised images == Commons community raise up in arms
The images contain metadata, which could be used for categorisation,at the book level.
The whole point of the wiki model is that we make incremental steps towards completion.
An analogy could be drawn with Wikipedia's "stub" articles.
It's not good for us to lobby institutions to release media, and then decline to accept it.
I would have liked the release to have been direct to Commons; at least, I would have liked the opportunity to debate whether to accept it. I hope that the next tome such an release is being considered, we will be in a better position to facilitate the former.
On 15 December 2013 19:36, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
The images contain metadata, which could be used for categorisation,at the book level.
Not that useful.
If you look at the images a lot are simply decorations and there are a fair number of duplications.
The whole point of the wiki model is that we make incremental steps towards completion.
An analogy could be drawn with Wikipedia's "stub" articles.
Commons already has 19 million images to make incremental steps on. En.Wikipedia has 4.4 million articles total, even the stubs are a lot more searchable and it has more people.
It's not good for us to lobby institutions to release media, and then decline to accept it.
So we need to decide in advance what we are looking at. With 19 million already we've reach the stage where we should probably be more selective.
I would have liked the release to have been direct to Commons; at least, I would have liked the opportunity to debate whether to accept it. I hope that the next tome such an release is being considered, we will be in a better position to facilitate the former.
Having the images on flickr isn't too bad. They are still searchable and fairly easy to import although my search results have been turning up less than 1% that area really of interest an even then the quality isn't always usable.
On 15 December 2013 16:08, Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada emijrp@gmail.com quoted:
We have released over a million imageshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibraryonto Flickr Commons
Please note that we have a project page, for discussion of importing these images to Commons in a sensible manner:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:British_Library/Mechanical_Curato...
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org