On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net>
wrote:
Note however, "We were about to be smeared
in all media as hosting
hardcore pornography with zero educational value and doing nothing about
it."
Fred Bauder
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, David Goodman <dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
And we are about to be presented in all responsible
free culture media
as having
acted as if such false accusations were true.
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
You mean they weren't true? Which part is false, that Commons hosted (and,
still continues to host) hardcore pornography with zero educational value,
or that you hadn't done anything about it?
"Much of the cleanup is done, although there was so much hardcore
pornography on commons that there's still some left in nooks and crannies."
Is that another one of those false accusations?