On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:59:05PM +0100, WereSpielChequers wrote:
Hi Kim,
For example you still use the word censorship when talking about the image
filter, now to me censorship is about somebody deciding for someone else
what they can or can't see or hear. As long as the image filter is about
enabling me to make choices about what I see then I don't consider that as
censorship, and I'm happy for others to also have that choice.
If you actually read what I write, you'll see that I don't actually use the
term censorship when refering to the image filter at all.
> * There's nothing wrong with the filter
program itself
Ok, so you actually literally just quoted me saying that.
I know you can do a lot better, I've seen it! :-) Please try!
I would hope that the developers will now be told to
try and write something
that finesses as much as possible of the feedback.
I think we should definitely consult with the community a bit more, and
do so properly.
There are multiple fork-risks if the foundation pushes forward, rightly
or wrongly.
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
--
[Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment]
gpg (
www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key FEF9DD72
5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A 01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72