*Hello,*
* As AffCom, we appreciate the interest in the situation with Wikimedia
Portugal that you have expressed on this thread. Our current focus is on
working to understand and resolve the conflicts and issues related to
Wikimedia Portugal, as well as attend to our other duties. However, we did
want to send a message to this list to clarify some points. First, we would
like to caution readers of this list against making conclusions regarding
this particular situation based solely on the information that has been
shared here. This thread does not present a complete and accurate picture
of the situation in Portugal (or the situation in Brazil, for that matter).
Though not comprehensive, we would like to provide a brief summary of the
situation, based on the information AffCom has received. As has mostly been
outlined previously in this thread, after WMPT’s years of inactivity,
recently, multiple individuals have become involved trying to create
activity and revitalize the chapter. However, those individuals have
conflicted with each other. Things escalated quickly, with various
accusations and threats being made. Earlier this year, AffCom was informed
of the conflict by the parties and began communicating with the individuals
involved. Despite AffCom's efforts to de-escalate the situation, certain
individual actions have kept intensifying it. As the conflict was
preventing the chapter from being able to engage in productive activity,
AffCom took the step of suspension, with clear requirements for the chapter
to meet to lift the suspension and avoid de-recognition. One of the larger
issues that WMPT has had to address is the lack of clear leadership of the
chapter following its two previous general assemblies. As detailed in the
suspension notice, there were issues reported to AffCom related to both IX
General Assembly (held on December 14, 2017) as well as X General Assembly
(held on April 15, 2018). In both cases, the best information available to
AffCom suggests that the meetings did not comply with the relevant portions
of the Chapter's bylaws and may not have complied with applicable local
laws. Wikimedia organizations are expected to fulfill all of their legal
and organizational governance requirements. These issues prompted the
requirement that WMPT convene a new assembly and elections process (held on
September 1, 2018), with the goal of holding an assembly which clearly
follows the relevant procedural requirements. Along with convening the
assembly, WMPT has currently met the requirements based on the timeline set
in the suspension notice from AffCom in July. They submitted their required
materials on time, and now AffCom is reviewing them. However, AffCom has
also received other information relating to the chapter's compliance with
particular governance requirements. AffCom is currently evaluating this
information along with the materials submitted by the chapter. AffCom will
be in touch with the chapter regarding any additional information we need.
We want to emphasize that Wikimedia Portugal is not being held to a
different or higher standard compared to other chapters, but is being held
to the standard expectations for chapter status. While we understand that
monitoring of compliance with those expectations may have been less
consistent in the past, we have been working in recent years to ensure that
all chapters are meeting the same basic standards. When a chapter is not in
compliance, there are several reminders and opportunities for correction in
advance of suspension. We suspend a chapter only if it does not
self-correct in response to the repeated reminders and/or warnings. Once a
chapter is suspended, we strive to provide a reasonable window for
remediation. Wikimedia Portugal has been on the committee’s radar due to
its years of minimal activity. As further conflict issues have surfaced,
concerns over the group’s capacity have grown. The committee however has no
wish to “kill” the community, but to ensure they are able to operate in a
way that upholds Wikimedia movement values and expectations for affiliate
organizations. A community cannot work effectively if its members are
spending all their energy on an internal conflict. Significant internal
conflict can also reflect poorly on the movement as a whole. We have
responded to this thread because we felt we should weigh in. However, we
cannot commit to continuing to participate in this conversation on
wikimedia-l. The committee needs to focus our time and energy on trying to
find and work toward the outcome in Portugal that is best for the Wikimedia
movement. That said, we will do our best to monitor responses on this
thread and take note of the questions, concerns, and criticisms expressed
here. We encourage you also to share your thoughts and ideas relating to
questions of movement governance and organization in the relevant movement
strategy conversations:
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20>
Regards, Maor On Behalf of the Affiliations Committee *
On 10/10/2018 8:31 p.m., Samuel Klein wrote:
Gonçalo, Goethe, and all: Thank you for your work, which I appreciate
dearly, and for the public discussion. I can also imagine this was a very
hard letter to write.
Paulo, to your concerns:
all costs.
Euh... surely not .v_v.
These troubles can come up in good faith, when two groups work intently
and separately on the same issue, ando d not talk openly to one another for
reasons of imagined duty + propriety. Tossing insults back and forth just
makes it easier for people to shut down communication.
Somehow I suspect that invocations of The Law and the intervention of
legal anxieties (with their preoccupations with secrecy) has led to much of
the trouble here. So Pine, to your point: /more/ legal counsel reporting
to only one of the parties involved might not help. On the other hand, we
as a movement deciding to share more openly our internal discussions around
legal concerns — even if this means taking on slightly more legal risk —
would reduce some of these evident social risks.
Warmly,
SJ
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:47 AM Paulo Santos Perneta <
paulosperneta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Some time ago, a Wikimedian friend told me AffCom
is like the physician
that comes to help with the cure when an Affiliate is ill. But that's
really what they were in this WMPT case? This is a very bizarre situation,
of which I'm personally having a lot of difficulties finding rational
answers to it, let alone any conclusion. All I can offer is a personal
account of the situation, to those who would be kind enough to have an
interest on this case.
Last May we at WMPT were really not expecting seeing AffCom bursting
through the room in an emergency intervention, fixing what didn't need to
be fixed, and willing to moderate what didn't need any moderation. As in
the proverbial Monty Phyton scene[1], they quickly became the problem
themselves.
Many of us at WMPT are long-term Wikimedian volunteers, some of us for
more
than a decade already, in perfect good standing in our communities, where
we hold and held responsibility roles. It includes current and former
bureaucrats, sysops, ArbCom members, very active contributors to a number
of Wikimedia projects. Most of us are founding members or directly
connected to WMPT since its inception in 2009.
Last March, when we took on ourselves this mission of fix and rebuild
Wikimedia Portugal, who had been dormant for about 5 years, we were not
expecting to face such a mighty and impenetrable adversary as AffCom has
proven to be.
For six months already we have been embroiled by AffCom in this Kafkian
suspension process, where we are generally not told what the accusations
are, and much less who is accusing us. It has been extremely painful,
exhausting, and frustrating for everyone involved.
We reached our limit. A number of us are now seriously considering
abandoning not only the chapter, but the Wikimedia projects entirely, if
we
continue not being treated with the fairness and transparency we deserve.
It truly begs the existential question of what are we all doing here,
dedicating countless and very valuable hours of our lives for a Movement
that lets this happen, for a Foundation-run committee[3] that apparently
wants to kill us at all costs.
Personally, I'm still confident that we'll successfully pass through this
probation, and everything will become again the very optimistic scenario
we
all had last April, when we successfully elected a working board, and
started working with great dedication in the many projects we have now
running here in Portugal. I can only imagine how painful it was and is
being for Gonçalo, to came here making this situation public and sharing
it
with everybody. We all have our dignity, nobody at WMPT likes this at all.
For many months we tried to cope with this discreet and silently. But
everything has a limit.
Regards,
Paulo
[1] -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spanish_Inquisition_(Monty_Python)
[2] - As AffCom seems to be, despite what is written in their Meta page(
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee)
GoEthe.wiki <goethe.wiki(a)gmail.com> escreveu no dia terça, 9/10/2018 à(s)
11:13:
The original message was rejected due to a filter
rule match, but you
can
access it here:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediapt/2018-October/002698.html
I am sending it below without the links. Please
access the link above
for
the full version.
__________
Sorry in advance for the lengthy email – the tl;dr version is: Wikimedia
Portugal has done all it was asked to do, so the suspension that was
held
conditional to performing those steps must be
lifted accordingly. For
the
sake of transparency, we are sending this out to
not only the AffCom
mailing list, but also Wikimedia-l and WikimediaPT-l.
_________
Dear members of AffCom,
(cc to the Wikimedia Portugal mailing list, Wikimedia mailing list)
Last 5th October we were again surprised by the content of your email
(quoted below) in response to us completing the roadmap we had agreed
upon
in order to remove the suspension of Wikimedia
Portugal. On that
message,
you say you have once more received information
whose substantiation is
not
mentioned, from sources that are not disclosed.
And still you seem to
accept it as the truth without even providing us with the opportunity to
get properly acquainted with it, let alone rebate or contradict it.
While
you speak of transparency, that message is
unsettlingly opaque, as have
been multiple such messages relayed to us in the course of this whole
process.
As you are well aware, Wikimedia Portugal was faced in March with a
situation where the president of the Board, João Vasconcelos, became
demissionary without any previous warning [1]. It should be noted that
when
Vasconcelos was elected as president of the Board
back in 2015, he
wasn’t
elected based on any background as a Wikimedia
editor, as he has no
history
of contribution to any of the Wikimedia projects,
but rather on his self
proclaimed merits on organisational and conflict management (!). Despite
the best efforts of several people from Wikimedia Portugal over the
years,
Vasconcelos sadly never really integrated well
neither on Wikimedia
Portugal, nor in the Portuguese Wikimedia community.
So, in light of what looked like an existential threat for WMPT, I and a
number of other WMPT members have publicly and transparently mobilized
ourselves to organize an extraordinary General Election to elect the new
Board. Vasconcelos was probably expecting/hoping that we would ask him
to
stay. But we have seen this sort of behavior
elsewhere [a].We didn't.
Instead, we handled the situation cooperatively, as a group, openly.
Vasconcelos never voiced any desire to take part on this collective
solution-building, as evidenced by his silence from the discussion on
the
Wikimedia Portugal mailing list in March [2] and
April [3]. He was
welcome
to do so. His only message to the mailing list
was two days (13 April)
before the 15 April General Assembly, announcing that he considered the
planned General Assembly null [4]. Given the lack of legal standing for
that claim, we carried on with the General Assembly (the transparent,
inclusive, democratic governing body of associations), summoned
according
to our by-laws. This General Assembly
successfully elected new governing
bodies, including the Board of Directors.
In May we were surprised by a message from AffCom demanding that we stop
taking part in a conflict, and "refrain from representing ourselves as
representatives of Wikimedia Portugal" (see quoted message in [5]
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediapt/2018-May/002621.html
).This
was the very first time the
Committee contacted Wikimedia Portugal about
this case. The message provided no legal precedent or framework for this
demand, no indication of what this conflict was, or why AffCom thought
the
Board was a part of it.
From what we understood, Vasconcelos went to the Wikimedia Conference in
Berlin, where he seems to have convinced AffCom that our General
Assembly
of 15 April was legally void.
We have repeatedly provided concrete evidence that t it was not the
case,
including quoting relevant court decisions
backing this [6]
<
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/(https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/priva…
.
In response, AffCom reported having no time to read through legal texts,
and therefore not being able to assess the validity of our declarations,
but that is beyond our control. And yet AffCom accepted Vasconcelos’
version without question. It is a legal imperative to be held innocent
until proven guilty, and until it is legally proven there was some
wrongdoing, General Assemblies are valid and binding.
After the April General Assembly we were working, in addition to our
activities and programs, to put the association in order in terms of
obligations to the Portuguese state and the tax authorities, providing
access to WMPT’s bank account to the persons designated on the 15 April
GA,
and so on. Things were getting on track...
We were surprised again in July by a message from AffCom temporarily
suspending Wikimedia Portugal’s recognition as a Wikimedia chapter [7].
In
that message for the first time you laid out a
concrete roadmap that, if
followed (as we understood), would lead to lifting the suspension. The
roadmap set out a list of demands from AffCom which we diligently
fulfilled, even well ahead of the required deadlines. We organized and
held
a new General Assembly in September, summoned
according to the
interpretation of the Portuguese Civil Code that AffCom relayed to us
(with
the exception of anything we believed would make
the proceeding illegal,
which was communicated in due time to AffCom). This General Assembly had
the same result as before [8]. The Assembly was normally held, despite
severe attempts of sabotage from Vasconcelos, reported in due time to
AffCom, Legal and the Safety team. In addition to the minutes [9], an
audio
recording of the assembly is available in Commons
[10] ; video
recording is
also available on request.
We then submitted our overdue Financial Report [11], demonstrated
support
from the community to the continuation of the
chapter [12], and wrote a
plan for improved chapter capacity [13]. All should be good now...
Having done all this, despite our disagreement that a new Assembly was
needed in the first place, we are now again surprised by the reception
of
the opaque message I mention in the beginning,
sent by AffCom to my
email
(quoted below) affirming that the Committee had
received reports from
unstated persons with unspecified concerns about the General Assembly
and
the capacity of Wikimedia Portugal to run as a
chapter. The message
claims
that "there were a number of issues with
lack of transparency [as well
as
with] providing an opportunity to participate in
an open, organizational
process" while not specifying these issues at all. Your message
questions
whether we are "prepared as an Affiliate to
prevent disruption in [our]
organization's collective pursuit of the movement’s mission", even
though
we have so far been able to handle every attempt
at disruption from
Vasconcelos.
If we rolled up our sleeves to activate the scattered energies of a
stale
organization in order to prepare and execute
April’s General Assembly,
it
was because we were convinced that Wikimedia
Portugal had a viable
future
ahead, and was of value to the Wikimedia
movement. At the time, the
actions
of Vasconcelos were so absurd that the reaction
to them even spurred
some
founders and (by then) inactive members of WMPT
to offer their help in
reestablishing a functional organization. Along with the help of a
number
of historic as well as new members who have been
steadily returning and
joining our ranks, that’s precisely what we are achieving.
That’s why we’ve been working on fulfilling the AffCom roadmap requests,
even if we didn’t like or agree with some aspects of it. All things
considered, it was a clear path to resolving our situation, and we found
that parts of it could be useful to the chapter. But AffCom’s
validation of
Vasconcelos’ actions and claims, even if
unintentional, have real
consequences for the mental state and safety of our members.
Back in March, when Vasconcelos claimed he had requested our bank to
lock
the chapter’s bank account, started a process at
the Public Prosecution
Service, and he had talked with an attorney on that subject, can you
imagine what André, our treasurer, felt waiting in line in the bank
until
he found what really happened? In the end, the
bank account had not been
locked because of any court order or legal reason as Vasconcelos
implied,
but rather because someone had tried to access
the bank account without
the
proper credentials, and the system automatically
locked the account.
Before the General Assembly in September, Vasconcelos sent out legal
threats and even menaces of police intervention to anyone
participating. We
still went through with it, but can you imagine
how we felt, the
pressure
that was under some of us? It was all a bluff in
the end, but this is
what
you put us through.
Notwithstanding, WMPT activities were happening in parallel. They are
listed on our activities plan for anyone to see [14], and more are
planned.
After several years of inactivity, we are happy
to be on a sustainable
growth path, gradually building capacity and doing the best we can with
the
resources available to us. We’ve also been using
our personal contacts
with
other movements in order to increase our
organization’s capacity. Ana,
newly appointed to the Board, has just returned from Wiki Takes Zamora,
where she was learning from Wikimedia Spain, relaunching the
collaboration
between both chapters. Two of the events we have
planned for November
are
using this paradigm. We’ll celebrate Wikidata’s
sixth anniversary with a
local group of data enthusiasts in Porto, and near Lisbon we’re helping
with the organization and will participate in a FOSS event, so in both
cases we’ll also acquire event organization skills. This growth path is
in
peril if you continue to undermine our efforts.
Over the last half year we’ve been attacked, offended, insulted,
received
multiple threats of judicial action by
Vasconcelos, and even an actual
intimidatory letter from a lawyer working for him (but purportedly on
behalf of WMPT); and during this entire time we’ve tried not to escalate
the situation, not to engage with such attempts at direct confrontation,
nor make them public. You force us now to disclose this in order to
clear
our name and set the record straight. With the
help and support of the
legal and security departments of the Wikimedia Foundation, we have
dealt
with the actions of Vasconcelos so far. And we
will follow the
disciplinary
procedures foreseen for these situations in our
bylaws which may result
in
his removal from the chapter.
We’ve repeatedly complied in unusually strict terms with legal
requirements, and with AffCom’s roadmap, while dealing with Vasconcelos’
actions as privately as we could in order not to affect the public
image of
the Wikimedia movement, nor its community – but
honestly, we’re reaching
the point of exhaustion in light of AffCom’s puzzling behavior along
this
process. We understand that AffCom may have
reserves regarding our
future,
but the way it is dealing with the situation is
clearly
counterproductive.
How can AffCom keep making new accusations
without at least asking us
for
information or confirmations?
Currently, our major source of disruption, distress and anxiety is each
new
message we receive from AffCom, as they
repeatedly defy our
expectations of
a partner claiming to be attempting to help us
getting back on our
feet. We
are actually wary that the next address could be
an announcement that
Wikimedia Portugal has been de-recognized, even after we have passed our
“road of trials”, due to the ever moving goalposts. Several of our key
people have reported insomnia, including myself, after receiving your
communications. We’re reaching our physical, psychological, and
motivational limit, in great part due to AffCom’s actions and
inexplicable
lack of support and transparency.
It is time to stop this! Despite what we still believe were your best
intentions, AffCom has inadvertently caused significant destabilization
for
Wikimedia Portugal.
Please honor your part of the compromise, lift this suspension and let
us
proceed in the productive pursuit of our
collective mission.
Regards,
Gonçalo
Gonçalo Themudo
*Presidente*
*Wikimedia Portugal*
*Email: *goethe.wiki(a)gmail.com
*Website: *http://pt.wikimedia.org <
https://sites.google.com/view/themudo>
*Imagine um mundo onde cada ser humano pode
partilhar livremente a soma
de
todo o conhecimento, na sua própria língua.*
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266
_______________________________________________
Affiliations Committee mailing
listAffCom@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/affcom
--
*"Jülüjain wane mmakat ein kapülain tü alijunakalirua jee wayuukanairua
junain ekerolaa alümüin supüshuwayale etijaanaka. Ayatashi waya junain."*
Maor Malul
Socio, A.C. Wikimedia Venezuela | RIF J-40129321-2 |
Member, Wikimedia Foundation Affiliations Committee
Phone: +972-52-4869915
Twitter: @maor_x
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Libre
de virus.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
<#m_-7902173747765467380_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________
Affiliates mailing list
Affiliates(a)lists.wikimedia.org