In a message dated 10/1/2006 10:09:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, wikilegal@inbox.org writes:
If there really is a tension between accuracy and openness, then it's quite clear which side we want to be on. Openness, after all, is merely a means to an end. With that in mind, in what ways do you suggest making the Wikimedia projects less open?
To quote you in your response to Brad. "Please don't misrepresent my position."
Danny
On 10/1/06, daniwo59@aol.com daniwo59@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 10/1/2006 10:09:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, wikilegal@inbox.org writes:
If there really is a tension between accuracy and openness, then it's quite clear which side we want to be on. Openness, after all, is merely a means to an end. With that in mind, in what ways do you suggest making the Wikimedia projects less open?
To quote you in your response to Brad. "Please don't misrepresent my position."
Danny
Feel free to explain how I misrepresented your position. Do you feel that the quote "There is a tension between accuracy and openness." is taken out of context? Do you feel that openness is more than just a means to an end?
If you'd instead like to retract your statement that "There is a tension between accuracy and openness.", that's fine too. It certainly doesn't seem to fit in with your employer's position.
Anthony
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org