In the following news article, it is said that Google showed French journalists in Paris a webpage with search results including Wikipedia in its presentation of its new "Goggles" search engine.

I think the WMF lawyers should have a closer look at that and see if WMF is not entitled to a compensation for letting Google use the Wikipedia trademark as a sales argument. I think using the Wikipedia name within a for-profit endeavour distorts the image of Wikipedia as a non-profit charity. Should Wikipedia be associated to a service restricted to the happy few who buy it ? Wikipedia should remain something for everybody to enjoy, not necessarily more associated to one operating system than another. It should not necessarily be associated with the organised obsolescence of older computers, and remain critical vis-à -vis the fascination for the new.

http://www.lepoint.fr/actualites-technologie-internet/2009-12-09/recherche-s...