After running a task force for BLP in two phases over six months back in
'09-'10, everything pointed toward something MZMcBride wrote on meta. It
covers this.
It just needs to be "official."
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:36 AM, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I have posted 4 sentences, kind of a draft of a draft
of a draft.
It is very overwhelming for me to draft text with near-legal precision on
my own.
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Asaf Bartov <abartov(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
I'd say "be bold" and start
drafting. Many people respond to a flawed
(or
at least improvable) text more readily than they
do to an open invitation
to contribute.
I, for one, share your perception that NPOV is a problem on some (perhaps
most) Wikipedias, and think it'd be a good idea to bolster NPOV with a
Board resolution. Not because it would instantly solve the problem, of
course, but I see its value in supporting those editors who'd fight to
uphold NPOV.
A.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:26 PM, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.neko(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Legal_and_Community_Advocacy#Draft_of_…
I started above text to draft a text for the board to review.
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:56 PM, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.neko(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> A talk page on meta wont be noticed by much which is why perhaps this
is
> > the better location for the discussion. It is not like I am
proposing a
> > meta policy.
> >
> > -- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net
> >wrote:
> >
> >> >> I am not disputing how settled it is but I don't think meta
> >> >> sufficiently
> >> >> achieves expressing how settled this core value really is. As you
> >> >> stated
> >> >> it
> >> >> would be more of a restatement and re-emphasis of what already
is a
>>
>> core
>> >> value.
>> >>
>> >> -- 㠨㠂る白㠄猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
>> >
>> > Yes, good idea, needs to be done. Please notify the board of
>> directors...
>> >
>> > Fred
>>
>> That was snippy...
>>
>> Editing a major meta policy page must be done with considerable
caution,
> >> starting by making suggestions on its talk page:
> >>
> >>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Neutral_point_of_view
> >>
> >> There is some, rather limited, discussion in section 3.
> >>
> >> Fred
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> >> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
,
> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Asaf Bartov
Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org>
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
https://donate.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>