Hi!
It's isn't my policy, it's our policy.
Who is 'we', whom do you represent? :-)
If you don't know to what I refer, then perhaps
you can read up on it.
You didn't tell what you represent and what policy you talk about, I don't know
where to read about it.
As far as citing the archives of an email list, that
is also not a citable
source.
Thats very sad. I'm used to my mailing list posts being cited ;-)
If Foundation staff and supporters themselves, are
*not prepared* to go on
the record with their claims, then why should anyone trust anything they say
on an email list?
I cannot speak for Foundation at the moment, so I don't know why they don't go
"on the record". I don't go "on the record" because I don't
see any purpose, I already wrote in email what I thought I wanted to write.
That is the very nature of *false authority*, the bane
of our project.
What do you call 'our project'? I don't understand your affiliation.
I must say, I'm quite surprised that some people
here don't grasp this concept yet,
after the projects being in existence for so many years now, almost a
decade right? It is a fundamental principle, that we should be citing actual
authorities, not false claims to authority.
I'm quite surprised you think I should care about whatever you want me to care because
you want me to care about it.
Cheers,
Domas