I fully agree and we *must* understand that any article is a collaborative work.
If one editor doesn't license it's contribution in CC-BY the whole article cannot be licensed in CC-BY.
And what about IP contributions? Can the CC-BY be assigned to an IP?
Ilario
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Massimiliano m.lincetto@gmail.com wrote:
I still don't understand why we should reject the copyleft philosophy and change to an attribution license. I think that our mission is not only to provide free information and knowledge, but also to be sure that it will be kept free. I don't think that we should change our licensing policies in order to be published on Google Knol: why we should do it? If Knols wants to allow its users to publish Wikipedia-derivative content they should change their terms, IMHO.
Massimiliano _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l