I fully agree and we *must* understand that any article is a collaborative work.
If one editor doesn't license it's contribution in CC-BY the whole
article cannot be licensed in CC-BY.
And what about IP contributions? Can the CC-BY be assigned to an IP?
Ilario
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Massimiliano <m.lincetto(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I still don't understand why we should reject the
copyleft philosophy and
change to an attribution license. I think that our mission is not only to
provide free information and knowledge, but also to be sure that it will be
kept free.
I don't think that we should change our licensing policies in order to be
published on Google Knol: why we should do it? If Knols wants to allow its
users to publish Wikipedia-derivative content they should change their
terms, IMHO.
Massimiliano
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l