The only specific and non-contradictory complaints about Wikipedia
bias I can find on
https://justapedia.org/wiki/Justapedia:Justapedia_Foundation are
climate change and COVID-19, which are areas in which I think
Wikipedia excels. The complaints about politics go in both directions.
Perhaps Atsme can clarify?
-LW
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:18 PM Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Sept 2023, 14:31 Rey Bueno via Wikimedia-l,
<wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
>> Justapedia
>
>
> It's laughable, as the logo [1] that (inadvertently,?) shows
"disinformation" and "lies" being given equal weight with
"information" in determining "truth" suggests.
>
> But this [2] hints at the darker underbelly:
>
> "The Editorial Review Board (ERB) [...] will make binding decisions regarding
the retention and rejection of article content, as well as serve to resolve content
disputes, and notability issues... ERB members are required to have a high level, native
understanding of written English"
>
>> Besides, there are alarming rumors I saw in Y Combinator [...]
>
>
> Oh, please. Do better than that.
>
>
> [1]
https://justapedia.org/wiki/File:Hands-circ-sifts-sources-Sm.png
>
> [2]
https://justapedia.org/wiki/Justapedia:Editorial_Review_Board
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org