On 14 Nov 2008, at 11:30, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Because this is one of the most heavily fought battles
that did not
result in a situation that is acceptable to all.
Well, since "mo" is now deprecated, re-naming it "ro-Cyrl" can be done
without really taking any decision. It's essentially cosmetic.
The issue is that the people behind the mo.wikipedia
are not living
anywhere near the areas involved and they are not native speakers/
writers either. It would have been good when this thing had been
just deleted because the pain would have worn off. However, the
decision was that when a native speaker comes along, it can be
restarted...
I don't understand. Is it to be deleted? Is it to be re-named? If not
the former, then surely the latter.
Michael Everson *
http://www.evertype.com