since that is the most recent xkcd, you may be thinking of the recent
http://xkcd.com/545/ "Neutrality Schmeutrality"
or
http://xkcd.com/214/ "The Problem with Wikipedia"
or
http://xkcd.com/446/ "in Popular Culture"
not to mention the classic
http://xkcd.com/285/ "Wikipedian protestor"
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 24, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Al Tally wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:09 PM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Eh I'm sure this was discussed somewhere already... anyway, it
brought a ton
of new editors in, which was both good and bad (we desperately need
more
good editors, but not vandals!)
--
Alex
(User:Majorly)
That's good; considering that Simple had someone running on their 9th
or 10th failed RFA with no intentions of giving up, it could probably
use more than the same 15 people.
-Dan
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG