On 28 November 2011 10:51, Andre Engels <andreengels(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I said that an image filter was not against our core
reacted to that by saying that I should show that there is a demand.
Then you added something about "all the points refuted a thousand
times like this". Surely it is quite reasonable that you considered
"there is no demand" as a refutation of "it is not against our core
mission". And for that to be a valid line of reasoning, you need to
have the rule "if there is no demand for something, it goes against
our core mission".
At this point you appear to be stretching to keep a flame war going.