Am 20. April 2012 21:58 schrieb Yaroslav M. Blanter <putevod(a)mccme.ru>ru>:
For instance, we have Scholarpedia, which is a
reliable source (no doubts
about it), they have editors responsible for different fields, these editors
are appointed by the Editor-in-Chief, and each article is written by a
single author and by invitation only. Do we want it to be a part of WMF? I
do not immediately see any net benefit.
Scholarpedia is not a case in point because it is not a Wiki. As you
described it, Scholarpedia lacks collaborative writing.
We have discussed recently whether to add Wikitravel/Wikivoyage to the
Wikimedia family of wikis. This is the kind of wikis I think of when
it comes to external links. At least Wikivoyage is often rather good.
Regards,
Jürgen.