On 12 September 2012 12:29, Deryck Chan deryckchan@wikimedia.hk wrote:
On 12 September 2012 12:27, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas@googlemail.com
wrote:
[...] fortunately courts do not rely on metaphors :)
Tom
Oh they do. That's precisely what case law is. Inaccurate metaphors are the reason that courts worldwide have a ridiculous view on what constitutes a copyright violation.
Ouch, no case law is not metaphors.
You won't see a court asking for metaphorical submissions to demonstrate guilt (or innocence).
Tom