On 12 September 2012 12:29, Deryck Chan <deryckchan(a)wikimedia.hk> wrote:
On 12 September 2012 12:27, Thomas Morton
<morton.thomas(a)googlemail.com
wrote:
[...] fortunately courts do not rely on metaphors
:)
Tom
Oh they do. That's precisely what case law is. Inaccurate metaphors are the
reason that courts worldwide have a ridiculous view on what constitutes a
copyright violation.
Ouch, no case law is not metaphors.
You won't see a court asking for metaphorical submissions to demonstrate
guilt (or innocence).
Tom