I don't really think that would be enough.. I am not sure but the poster and the license need to stay together.. If the attribution is on a paper with the poster the license and author can get lost...
Isn't it the same when a photo will be used in a newspaper but the attribution will be send on a flyer with the newspaper...
2009/2/4, Bence Damokos bdamokos@gmail.com:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Bence Damokos bdamokos@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Sam Johnston samj@samj.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:43 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/3 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, The economics of it are such that there is a real fine balance between
cheap
and expensive. I positvely hate text on my posters. Printing on the
back is
two prints and that IS expensive. My point has been and still is that
it is
nice to come up with "solutions". They have to be practical in the real world. If a proposed solution adds enough overhead, the effect will be
that
it will not be accepted a solution.
Assuming posters are not for large scale public display sending the credits on a separate bit of paper would probably meets the requirements.
I'm not aware of any print-on-demand providers who facilitate the sending of arbitrary documentation with prints so my ability to reuse is still unnecessarily restricted.
Sam
According to this [1], the Wikiposter service on the French Wikipedia provides attribution by printing a separate page with the license details.
In reply to Huib Laurens: is this the/a right way to attribute?
[1] http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet:Impression/en#Frequently_asked_questions
Best regards, Bence Damokos _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l