On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Sam Johnston <samj(a)samj.net> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:43 PM, geni
<geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/2/3 Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:
> Hoi,
> The economics of it are such that there is a real fine balance between
cheap
> and expensive. I positvely hate text on my
posters. Printing on the
back is
> two prints and that IS expensive. My point
has been and still is that
it is
> nice to come up with "solutions".
They have to be practical in the
> real
> world. If a proposed solution adds enough overhead, the effect will be
that
> it will not be accepted a solution.
Assuming posters are not for large scale public display sending the
credits on a separate bit of paper would probably meets the
requirements.
I'm not aware of any print-on-demand providers who facilitate the
sending of arbitrary documentation with prints so my ability to reuse
is still unnecessarily restricted.
Sam