On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I see, I was reading the statement to imply that
he/she was somehow using Wikimedia projects as a method of acquiring personally
identifiable information, not as a distribution method.
Cato (=Poetlister) was a checkuser, so they did also have access to
personally identifiable information.
Only the WMF can know whether the identity provided was fraudulent or
not, and if they destroyed all records like they say they do, even
they cant know.
--
John Vandenberg