On 8/10/06, Magnus Manske <magnus.manske(a)web.de> wrote:
While favorable, wikipedia does not really *need* high resolution photos
in this case; an image for a web site can be much smaller (200x300 pixel
would suffice) than an image needed for high-quality printing. Maybe
some companies would be willing to release such a low-res version under
GFDL or CC-BY-SA, as potential commercial use of these images is limited
due to their small size.
And yes, I'd prefer hi-res images too, but if the choice is "no free
image" or "small free image", I'd always go for the latter...
I didn't even think of that. Yes, the chance of companies willing to release
low-res versions would definitely be bigger.
Garion96