Gutza, your #2 statement does not follow, Cyrillic has been and is
currently used, including in schools, for the Eastern
Romance/Daco-Romanian/Romanian/Moldovan/whatever variety spoken in all
or some parts of Moldova (and/or, depending on your chosen political
reality, the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic).
The Thai script has never been used for English on a wide scale (read:
beyond one person, as a novelty), and certainly not by native or
heritage speakers of the English language. There is no comparison.
-m.
2010/10/12 Gutza <gutza(a)moongate.ro>ro>:
But then we have the following contradicting
statements (and both are
yours):
1. a Wikipedia is granted to a language not a country
2. the Moldovan language is in fact the Romanian language (the fact
that it's written in Cyrillic is as relevant as proposing a
project for English written in Thai)
So then, which *language* is this about?
Gutza
On 13-Oct-10 04:37, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
The solution of a dissolution of the mo.wikipedia is in the recognition that
it is Romanian language written in Cyrillic. This is the central argument
and, consequently the Romanian language is part of an acceptable solution.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 13 October 2010 03:34, Gutza <gutza(a)moongate.ro> wrote:
On 13-Oct-10 04:29, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Remember, a Wikipedia is granted to a language
not a
country.
True. But which language is this about, specifically?
Gutza
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l