On 18/07/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In no way am I criticizing the election, but I think
at least one of the
member of the board should be from a wiki not in the top 4-10. After all the
board represents us all and not just the top 4. Just an idea? What do you
think?
The top 10 (counting Wikipedias only) account for ~90% of our edits. I
don't have solid editor numbers - Greg might have some for
eligible-by-project? - but that seems a reasonable indicator that they
have about 90% of our community.
Yes, the board represents us all. But putting mandatory background
restrictions on what communities people have to come from does not
seem the best solution.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk