on 10/2/10 6:01 AM, SlimVirgin at slimvirgin(a)gmail.com wrote:
From:
"David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
> That [...] doesn't answer the question I asked:
> *what* about the approach in this paper wouldn't work for philosophy,
> in your opinion? Please be specific.
David, I think one of the reasons that biologists and others may be
happier than philosophers to edit Wikipedia is that everyone assumes
they know something about the latter and don't need to study for it,
<snip>
Academics don't have the time or patience to
explain basic points for
years on end to people who feel that reading books or papers about the
subject is unnecessary. I'm sure the biology experts would give up too
if their area of expertise were undermined in such a basic way.
Very well said, SV. I encounter the same thing in my field. You cannot teach
someone who will not be taught. You cannot teach someone something they
think they already know.
Marc Riddell